Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34452118›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2021

No Time Dependence of Ciprofloxacin Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Adults: Comparison of Individual and Population Analyses.

Martin Šíma, Danica Michaličková, Pavel Ryšánek, Petra Cihlářová, Martin Kuchař, Daniela Lžičařová, Jan Beroušek, Jan Miroslav Hartinger, Tomáš Vymazal, Ondřej Slanař

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin ŠímaDepartment of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6541-738X
Danica MichaličkováDepartment of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9690-9846
Pavel RyšánekDepartment of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6727-1663
Petra CihlářováForensic Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances, Department of Chemistry of Natural Compounds, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6552-0697
Martin KuchařForensic Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances, Department of Chemistry of Natural Compounds, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic.
Daniela LžičařováDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan BeroušekDepartment of Anesthesiology and ICM, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan Miroslav HartingerDepartment of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomáš VymazalDepartment of Anesthesiology and ICM, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic.
Ondřej SlanařDepartment of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZUniversity of Chemistry and Technology, Prague · CZ

Funding

Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy LTAUSA-243018Specific university research A1_FPBT_2021_002Univerzita Karlova v Praze PROGRES Q25/LF1Univerzita Karlova v Praze SVV 260523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this prospective PK study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin dosed within the first 36 h (early phase) and after 3 days of treatment (delayed phase) using individual and population PK analysis. The secondary aim of the study was to evaluate possible dosing implications of the observed PK differences between early and delayed phases to achieve a PK/PD target for ciprofloxacin of AUC

Indexed as

ciprofloxacincovariatesdosingNONMEMpharmacokineticsrenal function

Identifiers

PMID34452118
PMCPMC8402031
OpenAlexW3183546664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.