Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34452012›Full record

ReviewVaccines2021

Public Health Leadership in a VUCA World Environment: Lessons Learned during the Regional Emergency Rollout of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinations in Heidelberg, Germany, during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Christoph Schulze, Andreas Welker, Anne Kühn, Rainer Schwertz, Benjamin Otto, Laura Moraldo, Udo Dentz, Albertus Arends, Eckhard Welk, Jean-Jacques Wendorff and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05552989 (Towards Better Preparedness for Future Catastrophes - a Qualitative Mixed Methods Study of Lessons Learned From Civil-military Disaster Response in Heidelberg, Germany, During the COVID-19 Pandemic), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05552989 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Towards Better Preparedness for Future Catastrophes - a Qualitative Mixed Methods Study of Lessons Learned From Civil-military Disaster Response in Heidelberg, Germany, During the COVID-19 Pandemic

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital HeidelbergRan2022 to 2023Enrolled12ConditionsCOVID-19 Pandemic, EmergenciesArmsthis is a non-interventional study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Against the mental stress-Resilient work in surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  12. Strategy amidst complexity-what lies ahead for Indian healthcare.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Christoph SchulzePublic Health Service Rhein-Neckar District and Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas WelkerPublic Health Service Rhein-Neckar District and Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Anne KühnPublic Health Service Rhein-Neckar District and Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Rainer SchwertzPublic Health Service Rhein-Neckar District and Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Benjamin OttoPublic Health Service Rhein-Neckar District and Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Laura MoraldoPublic Health Service Rhein-Neckar District and Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Udo DentzFire and Disaster Management Agency Rhein-Neckar District, 68526 Ladenburg, Germany.
Albertus ArendsMedical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Eckhard WelkCIMIC District Liaison Commands Heidelberg and Rhein-Neckar, 3rd Medical Regiment, German Federal Armed Forces, 89160 Dornstadt, Germany.
Jean-Jacques WendorffCIMIC District Liaison Command Heidelberg, German Federal Armed Forces, 70374 Stuttgart, Germany.
Hans KollerInstitute of Technology and Innovation Management, Helmut-Schmidt-University, University of the German Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, 22043 Hamburg, Germany.
Doreen KussPublic Health Service Rhein-Neckar District and Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus RiesCIMIC District Liaison Commands Heidelberg and Rhein-Neckar, 3rd Medical Regiment, German Federal Armed Forces, 89160 Dornstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5054-5741

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to share methods used and lessons learned during a comprehensive inter-institutional pandemic disaster response in Heidelberg, Germany, conveying experiences of the regional SARS-CoV-2 vaccination rollout campaign for up to 1,000,000 vaccines in the year 2020. In this volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) environment, the following five strategic elements were pertinent for institutional arrangements so that specific contributions of the various project partners would be available fast without the necessity of extensive negotiations or information exchange: (1) robust mandate, (2) use of established networks, (3) fast onboarding and securing of commitment of project partners, (4) informed planning of supply capacity, and (5) securing the availability of critical items. Planning tools included analyses through a VUCA lens, analyses of stakeholders and their management, possible failures, and management of main risks including mitigation strategies. The method of the present analysis (VUCA factors combined with analyses of possible failures, and management of stakeholders and risks) can theoretically be adjusted to any public health care emergency anywhere across the globe. Lessons learned include ten tactical leadership priorities and ten major pitfalls.

Indexed as

COVID-19disasterdisaster managementdisaster responseleadershiplearning organizationorganizational psychologypandemicpublic healthresilienceSARS-CoV-2vaccinationVUCA worldvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID34452012
PMCPMC8402600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.