Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34452001›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Poland-Multifactorial Impact Trajectories.

Paweł Sowa, Łukasz Kiszkiel, Piotr Paweł Laskowski, Maciej Alimowski, Łukasz Szczerbiński, Marlena Paniczko, Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska, Karol Kamiński

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paweł SowaDepartment of Population Medicine and Lifestyle Diseases Prevention, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 13A, 15-089 Białystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8357-5816
Łukasz KiszkielSociety and Cognition Unit, University of Bialystok, 15-403 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0712-3260
Piotr Paweł LaskowskiSociety and Cognition Unit, University of Bialystok, 15-403 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8512-607X
Maciej AlimowskiDoctoral School of Social Sciences, University of Bialystok, 15-403 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0290-4217
Łukasz SzczerbińskiDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6201-0605
Marlena PaniczkoDepartment of Population Medicine and Lifestyle Diseases Prevention, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 13A, 15-089 Białystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5977-0745
Anna Moniuszko-MalinowskaDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Neuroinfections, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-089 Białystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3994-8785
Karol KamińskiDepartment of Population Medicine and Lifestyle Diseases Prevention, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 13A, 15-089 Białystok, Poland.

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2020/37/B/NZ7/03380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the declaration of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic confirmed by World Health Organization, work on the development of vaccines has been stimulated. When vaccines are commonly available, a major problem is persistent vaccine hesitancy in many European countries. The main goal of our study was to understand the multidimensional factors inducing this phenomenon in Poland. Our study was carried out at the third wave's peak of the pandemic, with record rates of daily cases and deaths associated with COVID-19. The results indicate that vaccine hesitancy/acceptability should always be considered in an interdisciplinary manner and according to identified factors where most negative attitudes could be altered. Our analyses included the assessment of a representative quota sample of adult Poles (

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2vaccine acceptabilityvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID34452001
PMCPMC8402463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.