Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34451965›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Usefulness of IVD Kits for the Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies to Evaluate the Humoral Response to Vaccination.

Krzysztof Lukaszuk, Jolanta Kiewisz, Karolina Rozanska, Malgorzata Dabrowska, Amira Podolak, Grzegorz Jakiel, Izabela Woclawek-Potocka, Aron Lukaszuk, Lukasz Rabalski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparison of five Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays across three doses of BNT162b2 reveals insufficient standardization of SARS-CoV-2 serology.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody quantitative titer reporting using the World Health Organization International Standard Units by four commercial assays.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparison of the measured values of quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody assays.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Krzysztof LukaszukInvicta Research and Development Center, 81-740 Sopot, Poland.
Jolanta KiewiszDepartment of Human Histology and Embryology, Medical Faculty, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-082 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2738-8952
Karolina RozanskaInvicta Research and Development Center, 81-740 Sopot, Poland.
Malgorzata DabrowskaCentral Clinical Laboratory, University Clinical Centre, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland.
Amira PodolakInvicta Research and Development Center, 81-740 Sopot, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1942-5522
Grzegorz JakielThe Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Gdansk, 01-004 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6094-2273
Izabela Woclawek-PotockaDepartment of Gamete and Embryo Biology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, 10-748 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1270-3438
Aron LukaszukInvicta Research and Development Center, 81-740 Sopot, Poland.
Lukasz RabalskiLaboratory of Recombinant Vaccines, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdansk, 80-307 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5292-9263
University of Gdańsk · PLGdańsk Medical University · PLInLife Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLUniversity Clinical Centre · PLUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe introduction of the vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection creates the need for precise tools for the quality control of vaccination procedures, detection of poor humoral response, and estimation of the achieved protection against the disease. Thus, the study aimed to compare the results of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 tests to evaluate the application of the WHO standard unitage (the binding antibody units; BAU/mL) for a measurement of response to the vaccination.

methodsPatients undergoing vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 (BNT162b2) (

resultsThe three assays showed varying correlations at different time points in the study. The overall agreement for all samples was moderate to high (ρ = 0.663-0.902). We observed the most uniform agreement for the day of dose 2 (ρ = 0.775-0.825), while it was least consistent for day 8 (ρ = -0.131-0.693) and 14 (ρ = -0.247-0.603) after dose 2. The dynamics of changes of the SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in patients without history of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection appears homogenous based on the Roche results, more heterogenous when considering the DiaSorin results, and in between for the Abbott results.

conclusionsThe results highlight the need for further work on the international standard of measurement of SARS-CoV-2 Ig, especially in the era of vaccination. The serological assays can be useful to detect IgG/IgM antibodies to assess the response to the vaccination. However, they cannot be used interchangeably. In terms of the evaluation of the immune response to the BNT162b2 vaccine, Roche and Abbott kits appear to be more useful.

Indexed as

Abbottassay comparisonCOVID-19DiaSorinPfizer/BioNTechRocheSARS-CoV-2vaccination

Identifiers

PMID34451965
PMCPMC8402409
OpenAlexW3189945768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.