Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34451949›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Effect of Professional and Extra-Professional Exposure on Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection among Healthcare Workers of the French Alps: A Multicentric Cross-Sectional Study.

Virginie Vitrat, Alexis Maillard, Alain Raybaud, Chloé Wackenheim, Bruno Chanzy, Sophie Nguyen, Amélie Valran, Alexie Bosch, Marion Noret, Tristan Delory

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Virginie VitratInfectious Diseases Department, Annecy Genevois Hospital, 74370 Epagny Metz-Tessy, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8595-6834
Alexis MaillardClinical Research Unit, Annecy Genevois Hospital, 74370 Epagny Metz-Tessy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7165-4103
Alain RaybaudOccupational Medicine Department, Alpes Leman Hospital, 74130 Contamine sur Arves, France.
Chloé WackenheimInfectious Diseases Department, Alpes Leman Hospital, 74130 Contamine sur Arves, France.
Bruno ChanzyVirology Laboratory, Annecy Genevois Hospital, 74370 Epagny Metz-Tessy, France.
Sophie NguyenHygiene Unit, Annecy Genevois Hospital, 74370 Epagny Metz-Tessy, France.
Amélie ValranInfectious Diseases Department, Annecy Genevois Hospital, 74370 Epagny Metz-Tessy, France.
Alexie BoschInfectious Diseases Department, Metropole Savoie Hospital, 73000 Chambery, France.
Marion NoretClinical Research Unit, Annecy Genevois Hospital, 74370 Epagny Metz-Tessy, France.
Tristan DeloryClinical Research Unit, Annecy Genevois Hospital, 74370 Epagny Metz-Tessy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0165-8934
Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois · FRCentre Hospitalier Métropole Savoie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to report SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence after the first wave of the pandemic among healthcare workers, and to explore factors associated with an increased infection rate. We conducted a multicentric cross-sectional survey from 27 June to 31 September 2020. For this survey, we enrolled 3454 voluntary healthcare workers across four participating hospitals, of which 83.4% were female, with a median age of 40.6 years old (31.8-50.3). We serologically screened the employees for SARS-CoV-2, estimated the prevalence of infection, and conducted binomial logistic regression with random effect on participating hospitals to investigate associations. We estimated the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at 5.0% (95 CI, 4.3%-5.8%). We found the lowest prevalence in health professional management support (4.3%) staff. Infections were more frequent in young professionals below 30 years old (aOR = 1.59, (95 CI, 1.06-2.37)), including paramedical students and residents (aOR = 3.38, (95 CI, 1.62-7.05)). In this group, SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was up 16.9%. The location of work and patient-facing role were not associated with increased infections. Employees reporting contacts with COVID-19 patients without adequate protective equipment had a higher rate of infection (aOR = 1.66, (95 CI, 1.12-2.44)). Aerosol-generating tasks were associated with a ~1.7-fold rate of infection, regardless of the uptake of FFP2. Those exposed to clusters of infected colleagues (aOR = 1.77, (95 CI, 1.24-2.53)) or intra-familial COVID-19 relatives (aOR = 2.09, (95 CI, 1.15-3.80)) also had a higher likelihood of infection. This report highlights that a sustained availability of personal protective equipment limits the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate to what is measured in the general population. It also pinpoints the need for dedicated hygiene training among young professionals, justifies the systematic eviction of infected personnel, and stresses the need for interventions to increase vaccination coverage among any healthcare workers.

Indexed as

COVID-19cross-sectional surveyhealthcare workersSARS-CoV-2serologic testing

Identifiers

PMID34451949
PMCPMC8402428
OpenAlexW3185230893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.