Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34451824›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Pulmonary Delivery of Anticancer Drugs via Lipid-Based Nanocarriers for the Treatment of Lung Cancer: An Update.

Ibrahim M Abdulbaqi, Reem Abou Assi, Anan Yaghmur, Yusrida Darwis, Noratiqah Mohtar, Thaigarajan Parumasivam, Fadi G Saqallah, Habibah A Wahab

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Emerging Nanomedicine Approaches in Targeted Lung Cancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ibrahim M AbdulbaqiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang 11800, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2028-4739
Reem Abou AssiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang 11800, Malaysia.
Anan YaghmurDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1608-773X
Yusrida DarwisSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang 11800, Malaysia.
Noratiqah MohtarSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang 11800, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-7040-2158
Thaigarajan ParumasivamSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang 11800, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-6278-3627
Fadi G SaqallahSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang 11800, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9120-6631
Habibah A WahabSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang 11800, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8353-8679
Universiti Sains Malaysia · MYUniversity of Kirkuk · IQUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia FRGS/1/2020/SKK0/USM/01/4 (account no: 203.PFARMASI.6711891)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths, responsible for approximately 18.4% of all cancer mortalities in both sexes combined. The use of systemic therapeutics remains one of the primary treatments for LC. However, the therapeutic efficacy of these agents is limited due to their associated severe adverse effects, systemic toxicity and poor selectivity. In contrast, pulmonary delivery of anticancer drugs can provide many advantages over conventional routes. The inhalation route allows the direct delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the target LC cells with high local concertation that may enhance the antitumor activity and lead to lower dosing and fewer systemic toxicities. Nevertheless, this route faces by many physiological barriers and technological challenges that may significantly affect the lung deposition, retention, and efficacy of anticancer drugs. The use of lipid-based nanocarriers could potentially overcome these problems owing to their unique characteristics, such as the ability to entrap drugs with various physicochemical properties, and their enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for passive targeting. Besides, they can be functionalized with different targeting moieties for active targeting. This article highlights the physiological, physicochemical, and technological considerations for efficient inhalable anticancer delivery using lipid-based nanocarriers and their cutting-edge role in LC treatment.

Indexed as

aerosolsdry powder inhalerslipid-based nanocarriersliposomeslung cancernanoemulsionsnanotechnologypulmonary deliverytargeted drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID34451824
PMCPMC8400724
OpenAlexW3184348546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.