Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34451728›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Okra (

Thamires Lacerda Dantas, Flávia Carolina Alonso Buriti, Eliane Rolim Florentino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Tapping into the potential of okra (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  17. Okra (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thamires Lacerda DantasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Campina Grande 58429-600, PB, Brazil.
Flávia Carolina Alonso BuritiPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Campina Grande 58429-600, PB, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3960-2271
Eliane Rolim FlorentinoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Campina Grande 58429-600, PB, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado da Paraíba Project 028/2018Programa de Apoio à Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa da Universidade Estadual da Paraíba Call 2015Programa Institucional de Apoio à Produção Científica na Pós-Graduação da UEPB Grant 001/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Abelmoschus esculentusfunctional foodgummucilageokrapolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID34451728
PMCPMC8399980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.