Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34451663›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Effective Pollination Period and Parentage Effect on Pollen Tube Growth in Apple.

Stefan Roeder, Sara Serra, Stefano Musacchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefan RoederTree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA 98801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5357-7941
Sara SerraTree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA 98801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4117-2875
Stefano MusacchiTree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA 98801, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8618-6202

Funding

United States Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service Technical Assistance for Specialty Crops program (T14RXTSC01). T14RXTSC01United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project (1014919) Hatch project (1014919)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flower receptivity is a limiting factor for the fertilization of several tree fruit. The effective pollination period (EPP) can be used to determine flower longevity and identify limiting factors by assessing stigmatic receptivity, pollen tube growth rate, and ovule longevity. EPPs were determined for three apple cultivars under natural field conditions in Washington State in 2019 and 2020. In addition, a greenhouse study, performed under semi-controlled conditions, evaluated the influence of six maternal parents on the pollen tube growth performance of six pollen sources. The duration of the stigmatic receptivity ranged from 6.3 to 8.1 days, depending on the cultivar and year-pollen tubes required between 5.5 and 7.0 days from the stigma to reach the ovules. Ovule longevity of non-pollinated flowers varied between 8.2 and 11.3 days. Combinations of these factors resulted in EPPs ranging from 3.0 days for 'Rubinstar' to 5.6 days for 'Olsentwo Gala' in the present experimental conditions. The greenhouse study revealed that parentage affected pollen tube growth performance. Importantly, a significant interaction between maternal and paternal factors indicated that the performance of different pollen sources depended on the maternal parent and that general recommendations on pollination need to account for the maternal parent.

Indexed as

in vivo pollen tube growthMalus domestica Borkhmaternal and paternal effects

Identifiers

PMID34451663
PMCPMC8398030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.