ArticlePolymers2021
The Relationship between a Defined Microstructure within the Mold Surface and the Corresponding Roughness on the Part: A Systematic Study on Particle Size, Filler-, and Compatibilizer Content.
Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The perception of a surface and its haptic properties are significantly influenced by roughness and microstructure, respectively, whereby non-negligible parameters include friction, contact area, temperature, and humidity between the human finger and the examined surface. In particular, for a scientific investigation on haptic influences, the production of samples with a defined surface roughness is indispensable. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of various mold insert roughnesses combined with the influences of particle size, filler-, and compatibilizer content on impression quality. An unfilled high density polyethylene was chosen as a reference for the impression quality investigations, while fillers with significantly different particle sizes and a compatibilizer were used to produce proprietary compounds. Injection molded parts were manufactured utilizing mold inserts with three different line roughness values. To support the obtained results, a multivariate analysis of variance, a simulation of the filling phase as well as a rheological material characterization were conducted. The results revealed that (i) the impression quality can be independent of the applied insert roughness based on the filler particle size that was studied, (ii) an increasing on both filler particle size and compatibilizer content raise the sample roughness as a function of the penetration ability of the filler into the insert valleys, and (iii) with a higher insert roughness, the thermoplastic moldings generally exhibit a significantly smoother topography. An assumed correlation between part roughness and melt viscosity could not be confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.