ArticlePolymers2021
Research on Quality Characterization Method of Micro-Injection Products Based on Cavity Pressure.
Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel Technique for Quality Control of Microinjection Molding.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Machine Learning in Injection Molding: An Industry 4.0 Method of Quality Prediction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cavity pressure in the injection molding process is closely related to the quality of the molded products, and is used for process monitoring and control, to upgrade the quality of the molded products. The experimental platform was built to carry out the cavity pressure experiment with a micro spline injection mold in the paper. The process parameters were changed, such as V/P switchover, mold temperature, melt temperature, packing pressure, and injection rate, in order to analyze the influence of the process parameters on the product weight. The peak cavity pressure and area under the pressure curve were the two attributes utilized in investigating the correlation between cavity pressure and part weight. The experimental results show that the later switchover allowed the injection to proceed longer and produce a heavier tensile specimen. By comparing different cavity pressure curves, the general shapes of the curves were able to indicate different types of shortage produced. When the V/P switchover position is 10 mm, the coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.