Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34451277›Full record

ReviewPolymers2021

Current Status of Cellulosic and Nanocellulosic Materials for Oil Spill Cleanup.

Siegfried Fürtauer, Mostafa Hassan, Ahmed Elsherbiny, Shaimaa A Gabal, Sherif Mehanny, Hatem Abushammala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Siegfried FürtauerFraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8939-3661
Mostafa HassanMechanical Design & Production Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo 12613, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-5221-6223
Ahmed ElsherbinyMechanical Engineering Department, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada.
Shaimaa A GabalCellulose and Paper Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza 12611, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-6351-6579
Sherif MehannyMechanical Design & Production Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo 12613, Egypt.
Hatem AbushammalaEnvironmental Health and Safety Program, College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi 51133, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0001-9347-4261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent developments in the application of lignocellulosic materials for oil spill removal are discussed in this review article. The types of lignocellulosic substrate material and their different chemical and physical modification strategies and basic preparation techniques are presented. The morphological features and the related separation mechanisms of the materials are summarized. The material types were classified into 3D-materials such as hydrophobic and oleophobic sponges and aerogels, or 2D-materials such as membranes, fabrics, films, and meshes. It was found that, particularly for 3D-materials, there is a clear correlation between the material properties, mainly porosity and density, and their absorption performance. Furthermore, it was shown that nanocellulosic precursors are not exclusively suitable to achieve competitive porosity and therefore absorption performance, but also bulk cellulose materials. This finding could lead to developments in cost- and energy-efficient production processes of future lignocellulosic oil spillage removal materials.

Indexed as

absorptionaerogelscellulosechemical modificationfabricsmembranesnanocelluloseoil spillage removalseparation

Identifiers

PMID34451277
PMCPMC8400096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.