Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34451192›Full record

ArticlePolymers2021

The Toxicity of Universal Dental Adhesives: An In Vitro Study.

Adam Wawrzynkiewicz, Wioletta Rozpedek-Kaminska, Grzegorz Galita, Monika Lukomska-Szymanska, Barbara Lapinska, Jerzy Sokolowski, Ireneusz Majsterek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam WawrzynkiewiczDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.
Wioletta Rozpedek-KaminskaDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9206-1203
Grzegorz GalitaDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.
Monika Lukomska-SzymanskaDepartment of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6110-4298
Barbara LapinskaDepartment of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2348-8515
Jerzy SokolowskiDepartment of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, Poland.
Ireneusz MajsterekDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.
Medical University of Lodz · PL

Funding

Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lodzi 503/5-108-05/503-51-001-19-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no consensus in the literature regarding the potential toxicity of universal dental adhesives (UDA). Being used in close proximity to the pulp, their biocompatibility should be an important factor in dental research. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of UDA in an in vitro model. The study was performed using a monocyte/macrophage peripheral blood SC cell line (ATCC CRL-9855) on four specific UDA, namely: All-Bond Universal (Bisco); CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick (Kuraray); G-Premio BOND (GC); Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE). The cytotoxicity of the investigated UDA was measured using the XTT colorimetric assay. The genotoxicity of the analyzed compounds was evaluated using an alkaline version of the comet assay. Furthermore, flow cytometry (FC) apoptosis detection was performed using the FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I. FC cell-cycle arrest assessment was performed using propidium iodide staining. The study observed significant differences in the toxicity of the UDA that were tested, as G-Premio BOND showed significant in vitro toxicity in all of the tests performed, while All-Bond Universal, CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick and Single Bond Universal did not present any significant toxic effects toward SC cell line. The in vitro toxicity of UDA should be taken into consideration prior to in vivo and clinical studies. The flow cytometry could improve the accuracy of dental materials research and should be incorporated into the standardization criteria.

Indexed as

biocompatibilitycytotoxicitydental materialsflow cytometrygenotoxicityuniversal dental adhesives

Identifiers

PMID34451192
PMCPMC8400476
OpenAlexW3191641560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.