Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34451005›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Deep Learning for Classifying Physical Activities from Accelerometer Data.

Vimala Nunavath, Sahand Johansen, Tommy Sandtorv Johannessen, Lei Jiao, Bjørge Herman Hansen, Sveinung Berntsen, Morten Goodwin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vimala NunavathDepartment of Science and Industry Systems, University of South-Eastern Norway, Hasbergsvei 36, Krona, 3616 Kongsberg, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6911-8056
Sahand JohansenCAIR, Department of ICT, University of Agder, Jon Lilletunsvei 9, 4879 Grimstad, Norway.
Tommy Sandtorv JohannessenCAIR, Department of ICT, University of Agder, Jon Lilletunsvei 9, 4879 Grimstad, Norway.
Lei JiaoCAIR, Department of ICT, University of Agder, Jon Lilletunsvei 9, 4879 Grimstad, Norway.
Bjørge Herman HansenDepartment of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, 4630 Kristiansand, Norway.
Sveinung BerntsenDepartment of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, 4630 Kristiansand, Norway.
Morten GoodwinCAIR, Department of ICT, University of Agder, Jon Lilletunsvei 9, 4879 Grimstad, Norway.
University of Agder · NOUniversity of South-Eastern Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical inactivity increases the risk of many adverse health conditions, including the world's major non-communicable diseases, such as coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and breast and colon cancers, shortening life expectancy. There are minimal medical care and personal trainers' methods to monitor a patient's actual physical activity types. To improve activity monitoring, we propose an artificial-intelligence-based approach to classify physical movement activity patterns. In more detail, we employ two deep learning (DL) methods, namely a deep feed-forward neural network (DNN) and a deep recurrent neural network (RNN) for this purpose. We evaluate the two models on two physical movement datasets collected from several volunteers who carried tri-axial accelerometer sensors. The first dataset is from the UCI machine learning repository, which contains 14 different activities-of-daily-life (ADL) and is collected from 16 volunteers who carried a single wrist-worn tri-axial accelerometer. The second dataset includes ten other ADLs and is gathered from eight volunteers who placed the sensors on their hips. Our experiment results show that the RNN model provides accurate performance compared to the state-of-the-art methods in classifying the fundamental movement patterns with an overall accuracy of 84.89% and an overall F1-score of 82.56%. The results indicate that our method provides the medical doctors and trainers a promising way to track and understand a patient's physical activities precisely for better treatment.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2AccelerometryExerciseHumansNeural Networks, Computeraccelerometer dataclassificationdeep learningDNNfeed-forward neural networkhealthmachine learningphysical activityrecurrent neural networkRNNsensorsUCI

Identifiers

PMID34451005
PMCPMC8402311
OpenAlexW3195560328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.