Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34450976›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Artificial Intelligence Surgery: How Do We Get to Autonomous Actions in Surgery?

Andrew A Gumbs, Isabella Frigerio, Gaya Spolverato, Roland Croner, Alfredo Illanes, Elie Chouillard, Eyad Elyan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
24.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Clear Vision, Clear Savings: Enhancing Efficiency in Minimally Invasive Surgery.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Artificial intelligence: revolutionizing robotic surgery: review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrew A GumbsCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de POISSY/SAINT-GERMAIN-EN-LAYE 10, Rue Champ de Gaillard, 78300 Poissy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7044-5318
Isabella FrigerioDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, 37019 Peschiera del Garda, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7616-4226
Gaya SpolveratoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy.
Roland CronerDepartment of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplantation Surgery, University of Magdeburg, Haus 60a, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Alfredo IllanesINKA-Innovation Laboratory for Image Guided Therapy, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0118-0483
Elie ChouillardCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de POISSY/SAINT-GERMAIN-EN-LAYE 10, Rue Champ de Gaillard, 78300 Poissy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4100-7412
Eyad ElyanSchool of Computing, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen AB10 7JG, UK.
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy · FRCasa di Cura Villa Garda · ITOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DERobert Gordon University · GBUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most surgeons are skeptical as to the feasibility of autonomous actions in surgery. Interestingly, many examples of autonomous actions already exist and have been around for years. Since the beginning of this millennium, the field of artificial intelligence (AI) has grown exponentially with the development of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), computer vision (CV) and natural language processing (NLP). All of these facets of AI will be fundamental to the development of more autonomous actions in surgery, unfortunately, only a limited number of surgeons have or seek expertise in this rapidly evolving field. As opposed to AI in medicine, AI surgery (AIS) involves autonomous movements. Fortuitously, as the field of robotics in surgery has improved, more surgeons are becoming interested in technology and the potential of autonomous actions in procedures such as interventional radiology, endoscopy and surgery. The lack of haptics, or the sensation of touch, has hindered the wider adoption of robotics by many surgeons; however, now that the true potential of robotics can be comprehended, the embracing of AI by the surgical community is more important than ever before. Although current complete surgical systems are mainly only examples of tele-manipulation, for surgeons to get to more autonomously functioning robots, haptics is perhaps not the most important aspect. If the goal is for robots to ultimately become more and more independent, perhaps research should not focus on the concept of haptics as it is perceived by humans, and the focus should be on haptics as it is perceived by robots/computers. This article will discuss aspects of ML, DL, CV and NLP as they pertain to the modern practice of surgery, with a focus on current AI issues and advances that will enable us to get to more autonomous actions in surgery. Ultimately, there may be a paradigm shift that needs to occur in the surgical community as more surgeons with expertise in AI may be needed to fully unlock the potential of AIS in a safe, efficacious and timely manner.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRoboticsEndoscopyHumansMachine LearningNatural Language Processingartificial intelligence surgeryautonomous roboticscomputer visiondeep learningmachine learningnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID34450976
PMCPMC8400539
OpenAlexW3193396633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.