ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Artificial Intelligence Surgery: How Do We Get to Autonomous Actions in Surgery?
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 151 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: a bibliometric analysis of the 5-year trends in literature.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The Advances in Computer Vision That Are Enabling More Autonomous Actions in Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Clear Vision, Clear Savings: Enhancing Efficiency in Minimally Invasive Surgery.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsPooled it
- Surgery 4.0: From the Smart Operating Room to the Learning Operating Room.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Applications of Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Surgical Robotics: A Systematic Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Study - International multicentric minimally invasive liver resection (SIMMILR-4) : a comparison of conventional, digitally enhanced and collaborative robotic with Tele-robotic laparoscopic surgery for colorectal liver metastases.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- The AI Surge in Surgery: Evolution, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Outcome prediction for cholangiocarcinoma prognosis: Embracing the machine learning era.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Personalized medication recommendations for Parkinson's disease patients using gated recurrent units and SHAP interpretability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Systematic Integration of Artificial Intelligence Models in Appendicitis Management: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Surgery: Transforming Outcomes and Shaping the Future.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Barriers and recommendations for the implementation of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery in Africa.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- The Intraoperative Role of Artificial Intelligence Within General Surgery: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence: revolutionizing robotic surgery: review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Smart Operating Room in Digestive Surgery: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Orthopaedic surgeons display a positive outlook towards artificial intelligence: A survey among members of the AGA Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications for Thoracic Surgeons: "The Phenomenal Cosmic Powers of the Magic Lamp".Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most surgeons are skeptical as to the feasibility of autonomous actions in surgery. Interestingly, many examples of autonomous actions already exist and have been around for years. Since the beginning of this millennium, the field of artificial intelligence (AI) has grown exponentially with the development of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), computer vision (CV) and natural language processing (NLP). All of these facets of AI will be fundamental to the development of more autonomous actions in surgery, unfortunately, only a limited number of surgeons have or seek expertise in this rapidly evolving field. As opposed to AI in medicine, AI surgery (AIS) involves autonomous movements. Fortuitously, as the field of robotics in surgery has improved, more surgeons are becoming interested in technology and the potential of autonomous actions in procedures such as interventional radiology, endoscopy and surgery. The lack of haptics, or the sensation of touch, has hindered the wider adoption of robotics by many surgeons; however, now that the true potential of robotics can be comprehended, the embracing of AI by the surgical community is more important than ever before. Although current complete surgical systems are mainly only examples of tele-manipulation, for surgeons to get to more autonomously functioning robots, haptics is perhaps not the most important aspect. If the goal is for robots to ultimately become more and more independent, perhaps research should not focus on the concept of haptics as it is perceived by humans, and the focus should be on haptics as it is perceived by robots/computers. This article will discuss aspects of ML, DL, CV and NLP as they pertain to the modern practice of surgery, with a focus on current AI issues and advances that will enable us to get to more autonomous actions in surgery. Ultimately, there may be a paradigm shift that needs to occur in the surgical community as more surgeons with expertise in AI may be needed to fully unlock the potential of AIS in a safe, efficacious and timely manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.