Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34450935›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Automated Cyber and Privacy Risk Management Toolkit.

Gustavo Gonzalez-Granadillo, Sofia Anna Menesidou, Dimitrios Papamartzivanos, Ramon Romeu, Diana Navarro-Llobet, Caxton Okoh, Sokratis Nifakos, Christos Xenakis, Emmanouil Panaousis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Gustavo Gonzalez-GranadilloATOS Spain, Atos Research & Innovation, Cybersecurity Unit, 08020 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2036-981X
Sofia Anna MenesidouUBITECH Ltd., Thessalias 8 & Etolias 10, 152 31 Chalandri, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2446-5470
Dimitrios PapamartzivanosUBITECH Ltd., Thessalias 8 & Etolias 10, 152 31 Chalandri, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9471-5415
Ramon RomeuFundació Privada Hospital Asil de Granollers, 08402 Granollers, Spain.
Diana Navarro-LlobetFundació Privada Hospital Asil de Granollers, 08402 Granollers, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0563-3937
Caxton OkohSchool of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Greenwich, London SE10 9LS, UK.
Sokratis NifakosKarolinska Institutet Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Tomtebodavägen 18b, 171 77 Solna, Sweden.
Christos XenakisDepartment of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus, Karaoli ke Dimitriou 80, 185 34 Pireas, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6718-122X
Emmanouil PanaousisSchool of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Greenwich, London SE10 9LS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7306-4062
Hospital General de Granollers · ESUbitech (Greece) · GRUniversity of Greenwich · GBAtos (Spain) · ESKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Piraeus · GR

Funding

Seventh Framework Programme 826404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addressing cyber and privacy risks has never been more critical for organisations. While a number of risk assessment methodologies and software tools are available, it is most often the case that one must, at least, integrate them into a holistic approach that combines several appropriate risk sources as input to risk mitigation tools. In addition, cyber risk assessment primarily investigates cyber risks as the consequence of vulnerabilities and threats that threaten assets of the investigated infrastructure. In fact, cyber risk assessment is decoupled from privacy impact assessment, which aims to detect privacy-specific threats and assess the degree of compliance with data protection legislation. Furthermore, a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) is conducted in a proactive manner during the design phase of a system, combining processing activities and their inter-dependencies with assets, vulnerabilities, real-time threats and Personally Identifiable Information (PII) that may occur during the dynamic life-cycle of systems. In this paper, we propose a cyber and privacy risk management toolkit, called AMBIENT (Automated Cyber and Privacy Risk Management Toolkit) that addresses the above challenges by implementing and integrating three distinct software tools. AMBIENT not only assesses cyber and privacy risks in a thorough and automated manner but it also offers decision-support capabilities, to recommend optimal safeguards using the well-known repository of the Center for Internet Security (CIS) Controls. To the best of our knowledge, AMBIENT is the first toolkit in the academic literature that brings together the aforementioned capabilities. To demonstrate its use, we have created a case scenario based on information about cyber attacks we have received from a healthcare organisation, as a reference sector that faces critical cyber and privacy threats.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityPrivacyRisk AssessmentRisk Managementcybersecurityhealthcareprivacyrisk assessmentrisk controltoolkit

Identifiers

PMID34450935
PMCPMC8399421
OpenAlexW3193901082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.