Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34450879›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Clinically Interpretable Computer-Vision Based Method for Quantifying Gait in Parkinson's Disease.

Samuel Rupprechter, Gareth Morinan, Yuwei Peng, Thomas Foltynie, Krista Sibley, Rimona S Weil, Louise-Ann Leyland, Fahd Baig, Francesca Morgante, Ro'ee Gilron and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Video-Based Data-Driven Models for Diagnosing Movement Disorders: Review and Future Directions.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Samuel RupprechterMachine Medicine Technologies Ltd., The Leather Market Unit 1.1.4, 11/13 Weston Street, London SE1 3ER, UK.
Gareth MorinanMachine Medicine Technologies Ltd., The Leather Market Unit 1.1.4, 11/13 Weston Street, London SE1 3ER, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9727-5630
Yuwei PengMachine Medicine Technologies Ltd., The Leather Market Unit 1.1.4, 11/13 Weston Street, London SE1 3ER, UK.
Thomas FoltynieDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0752-1813
Krista SibleyDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Rimona S WeilDementia Research Center, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Louise-Ann LeylandDementia Research Center, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Fahd BaigNeuroscience Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3315-2698
Francesca MorganteNeuroscience Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9834-3639
Ro'ee GilronThe Starr Lab, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, HSE-823, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Robert WiltThe Starr Lab, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, HSE-823, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Philip StarrThe Starr Lab, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, HSE-823, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Robert A HauserParkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, Parkinson Foundation Center of Excellence, University of South Florida, 4001 E Fletcher Ave, Tampa, FL 33613, USA.
Jonathan O'KeeffeMachine Medicine Technologies Ltd., The Leather Market Unit 1.1.4, 11/13 Weston Street, London SE1 3ER, UK.
University of California, San Francisco · USNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBUK Dementia Research Institute · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

Innovate UK 26692Wellcome Trust 205167/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait is a core motor function and is impaired in numerous neurological diseases, including Parkinson's disease (PD). Treatment changes in PD are frequently driven by gait assessments in the clinic, commonly rated as part of the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) assessment (item 3.10). We proposed and evaluated a novel approach for estimating severity of gait impairment in Parkinson's disease using a computer vision-based methodology. The system we developed can be used to obtain an estimate for a rating to catch potential errors, or to gain an initial rating in the absence of a trained clinician-for example, during remote home assessments. Videos (n=729) were collected as part of routine MDS-UPDRS gait assessments of Parkinson's patients, and a deep learning library was used to extract body key-point coordinates for each frame. Data were recorded at five clinical sites using commercially available mobile phones or tablets, and had an associated severity rating from a trained clinician. Six features were calculated from time-series signals of the extracted key-points. These features characterized key aspects of the movement including speed (step frequency, estimated using a novel Gamma-Poisson Bayesian model), arm swing, postural control and smoothness (or roughness) of movement. An ordinal random forest classification model (with one class for each of the possible ratings) was trained and evaluated using 10-fold cross validation. Step frequency point estimates from the Bayesian model were highly correlated with manually labelled step frequencies of 606 video clips showing patients walking towards or away from the camera (Pearson's r=0.80, p<0.001). Our classifier achieved a balanced accuracy of 50% (chance = 25%). Estimated UPDRS ratings were within one of the clinicians' ratings in 95% of cases. There was a significant correlation between clinician labels and model estimates (Spearman's ρ=0.52, p<0.001). We show how the interpretability of the feature values could be used by clinicians to support their decision-making and provide insight into the model's objective UPDRS rating estimation. The severity of gait impairment in Parkinson's disease can be estimated using a single patient video, recorded using a consumer mobile device and within standard clinical settings; i.e., videos were recorded in various hospital hallways and offices rather than gait laboratories. This approach can support clinicians during routine assessments by providing an objective rating (or second opinion), and has the potential to be used for remote home assessments, which would allow for more frequent monitoring.

Indexed as

Gait Disorders, NeurologicParkinson DiseaseBayes TheoremComputersGaitHumanscomputer visiongaitinterpretable machine learningParkinson’s diseasepose estimationtime series analysis

Identifiers

PMID34450879
PMCPMC8399017
OpenAlexW3188233954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.