Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34450868›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Using Machine Learning for Remote Behaviour Classification-Verifying Acceleration Data to Infer Feeding Events in Free-Ranging Cheetahs.

Lisa Giese, Jörg Melzheimer, Dirk Bockmühl, Bernd Wasiolka, Wanja Rast, Anne Berger, Bettina Wachter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisa GieseLeibniz-Institute for Zoo- and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany.
Jörg MelzheimerLeibniz-Institute for Zoo- and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany.
Dirk BockmühlLeibniz-Institute for Zoo- and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany.
Bernd WasiolkaLeibniz-Institute for Zoo- and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany.
Wanja RastLeibniz-Institute for Zoo- and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3465-3117
Anne BergerLeibniz-Institute for Zoo- and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5765-8039
Bettina WachterLeibniz-Institute for Zoo- and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0414-2298

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioural studies of elusive wildlife species are challenging but important when they are threatened and involved in human-wildlife conflicts. Accelerometers (ACCs) and supervised machine learning algorithms (MLAs) are valuable tools to remotely determine behaviours. Here we used five captive cheetahs in Namibia to test the applicability of ACC data in identifying six behaviours by using six MLAs on data we ground-truthed by direct observations. We included two ensemble learning approaches and a probability threshold to improve prediction accuracy. We used the model to then identify the behaviours in four free-ranging cheetah males. Feeding behaviours identified by the model and matched with corresponding GPS clusters were verified with previously identified kill sites in the field. The MLAs and the two ensemble learning approaches in the captive cheetahs achieved precision (recall) ranging from 80.1% to 100.0% (87.3% to 99.2%) for resting, walking and trotting/running behaviour, from 74.4% to 81.6% (54.8% and 82.4%) for feeding behaviour and from 0.0% to 97.1% (0.0% and 56.2%) for drinking and grooming behaviour. The model application to the ACC data of the free-ranging cheetahs successfully identified all nine kill sites and 17 of the 18 feeding events of the two brother groups. We demonstrated that our behavioural model reliably detects feeding events of free-ranging cheetahs. This has useful applications for the determination of cheetah kill sites and helping to mitigate human-cheetah conflicts.

Indexed as

AcinonyxAccelerationAnimalsAnimals, WildHumansMachine LearningMaleNamibiaaccelerometryAcinonyx jubatusautomated behaviour classificationcheetahGPS clusterssupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID34450868
PMCPMC8398415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.