Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34450854›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Endoscopic Image-Based Skill Assessment in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Gábor Lajkó, Renáta Nagyné Elek, Tamás Haidegger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reproducibility challenges in robotic surgery.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gábor LajkóAutonomous Systems Track, Double Degree Programme, EIT Digital Master School, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0003-0408
Renáta Nagyné ElekAntal Bejczy Center for Intelligent Robotics, University Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3030-254X
Tamás HaideggerAntal Bejczy Center for Intelligent Robotics, University Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-1402-1139

Funding

National Research, Development and Innovation Office 019-1.3.1-KK-2019-00007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective skill assessment-based personal performance feedback is a vital part of surgical training. Either kinematic-acquired through surgical robotic systems, mounted sensors on tooltips or wearable sensors-or visual input data can be employed to perform objective algorithm-driven skill assessment. Kinematic data have been successfully linked with the expertise of surgeons performing Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery (RAMIS) procedures, but for traditional, manual Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS), they are not readily available as a method. 3D visual features-based evaluation methods tend to outperform 2D methods, but their utility is limited and not suited to MIS training, therefore our proposed solution relies on 2D features. The application of additional sensors potentially enhances the performance of either approach. This paper introduces a general 2D image-based solution that enables the creation and application of surgical skill assessment in any training environment. The 2D features were processed using the feature extraction techniques of a previously published benchmark to assess the attainable accuracy. We relied on the JHU-ISI Gesture and Skill Assessment Working Set dataset-co-developed by the Johns Hopkins University and Intuitive Surgical Inc. Using this well-established set gives us the opportunity to comparatively evaluate different feature extraction techniques. The algorithm reached up to 95.74% accuracy in individual trials. The highest mean accuracy-averaged over five cross-validation trials-for the surgical subtask of Knot-Tying was 83.54%, for Needle-Passing 84.23% and for Suturing 81.58%. The proposed method measured well against the state of the art in 2D visual-based skill assessment, with more than 80% accuracy for all three surgical subtasks available in JIGSAWS (Knot-Tying, Suturing and Needle-Passing). By introducing new visual features-such as image-based orientation and image-based collision detection-or, from the evaluation side, utilising other Support Vector Machine kernel methods, tuning the hyperparameters or using other classification methods (e.g., the boosted trees algorithm) instead, classification accuracy can be further improved. We showed the potential use of optical flow as an input for RAMIS skill assessment, highlighting the maximum accuracy achievable with these data by evaluating it with an established skill assessment benchmark, by evaluating its methods independently. The highest performing method, the Residual Neural Network, reached means of 81.89%, 84.23% and 83.54% accuracy for the skills of Suturing, Needle-Passing and Knot-Tying, respectively.

Indexed as

RoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresClinical CompetenceHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSuturesJIGSAWSoptical flowrobot-assisted minimally invasive surgerysurgical skill assessment

Identifiers

PMID34450854
PMCPMC8398563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.