ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Endoscopic Image-Based Skill Assessment in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review.The British journal of surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery using artificial intelligence: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-driven real-time assistance in minimally invasive surgery: a technology-oriented narrative review.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2026Review
- Deep learning for video-based assessment of endotracheal intubation skills.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Weakly Supervised Pose Estimation of Surgical Instrument from a Single Endoscopic Image.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The importance of non-technical skills in robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Enhanced U-Net with GridMask (EUGNet): A Novel Approach for Robotic Surgical Tool Segmentation.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- A Deep Learning Approach to Classify Surgical Skill in Microsurgery Using Force Data from a Novel Sensorised Surgical Glove.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- An Automated Skill Assessment Framework Based on Visual Motion Signals and a Deep Neural Network in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Video-based formative and summative assessment of surgical tasks using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Reproducibility challenges in robotic surgery.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023Review
- Interactive 3D Force/Torque Parameter Acquisition and Correlation Identification during Primary Trocar Insertion in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: 5 Cases.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Sensor-Based Automated Detection of Electrosurgical Cautery States.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective skill assessment-based personal performance feedback is a vital part of surgical training. Either kinematic-acquired through surgical robotic systems, mounted sensors on tooltips or wearable sensors-or visual input data can be employed to perform objective algorithm-driven skill assessment. Kinematic data have been successfully linked with the expertise of surgeons performing Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery (RAMIS) procedures, but for traditional, manual Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS), they are not readily available as a method. 3D visual features-based evaluation methods tend to outperform 2D methods, but their utility is limited and not suited to MIS training, therefore our proposed solution relies on 2D features. The application of additional sensors potentially enhances the performance of either approach. This paper introduces a general 2D image-based solution that enables the creation and application of surgical skill assessment in any training environment. The 2D features were processed using the feature extraction techniques of a previously published benchmark to assess the attainable accuracy. We relied on the JHU-ISI Gesture and Skill Assessment Working Set dataset-co-developed by the Johns Hopkins University and Intuitive Surgical Inc. Using this well-established set gives us the opportunity to comparatively evaluate different feature extraction techniques. The algorithm reached up to 95.74% accuracy in individual trials. The highest mean accuracy-averaged over five cross-validation trials-for the surgical subtask of Knot-Tying was 83.54%, for Needle-Passing 84.23% and for Suturing 81.58%. The proposed method measured well against the state of the art in 2D visual-based skill assessment, with more than 80% accuracy for all three surgical subtasks available in JIGSAWS (Knot-Tying, Suturing and Needle-Passing). By introducing new visual features-such as image-based orientation and image-based collision detection-or, from the evaluation side, utilising other Support Vector Machine kernel methods, tuning the hyperparameters or using other classification methods (e.g., the boosted trees algorithm) instead, classification accuracy can be further improved. We showed the potential use of optical flow as an input for RAMIS skill assessment, highlighting the maximum accuracy achievable with these data by evaluating it with an established skill assessment benchmark, by evaluating its methods independently. The highest performing method, the Residual Neural Network, reached means of 81.89%, 84.23% and 83.54% accuracy for the skills of Suturing, Needle-Passing and Knot-Tying, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.