Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34450678›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2022

Systematic Review on White Spot Lesions Treatments.

Francesco Puleio, Luca Fiorillo, Francesca Gorassini, Alfredo Iandolo, Aida Meto, Cesare D'Amico, Gabriele Cervino, Mirta Pinizzotto, Giancarlo Bruno, Marco Portelli and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. PeerJ · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco PuleioDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Messina University, Messina, Italy.
Luca FiorilloDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Messina University, Messina, Italy.
Francesca GorassiniDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Messina University, Messina, Italy.
Alfredo IandoloDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Aida MetoDepartment of Dental Therapy, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine, Tirana, Albania.ORCID 0000-0002-3354-2194
Cesare D'AmicoDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Messina University, Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1378-2588
Gabriele CervinoDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Messina University, Messina, Italy.
Mirta PinizzottoDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Messina University, Messina, Italy.
Giancarlo BrunoDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Messina University, Messina, Italy.
Marco PortelliDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Messina University, Messina, Italy.
Alessandra AmatoMultidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Odontostomatological Specialties, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy.
Roberto Lo GiudiceDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Messina University, Messina, Italy.
University of Messina · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Medicine Tirana · ALUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The difference in refractive index between the healthy enamel and the demineralized area generates a lesion with a milky white opaque appearance, clearly distinguishable from the surrounding healthy enamel. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate if the infiltration technique is the most efficient treatment to resolve a white spot lesion when compared with remineralization and microabrasion techniques. The Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome question investigated: "in enamel WS lesion, the infiltration treatment compared to remineralization or microabrasion treatments is more or less effective in the camouflage effect?." The research was performed on electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and web of science. The search was conducted up to April 1, 2020. The scientific search engines produced 324 results. Only 14 were screened after screening. Based on the articles analyzed in this systematic review, the resin infiltration technique seems to be the most effective and predictable treatment for the aesthetic resolution of WSLs.

Identifiers

PMID34450678
PMCPMC8890924
OpenAlexW3196027690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.