Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34450341›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM2021

Application of telemedicine video visits in a maternal-fetal medicine practice at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jessica N Tozour, Samantha Bandremer, Elizabeth Patberg, Jose Zavala, Meredith Akerman, Martin Chavez, Devin M Mann, Paul A Testa, Anthony M Vintzileos, Hye J Heo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica N TozourDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (Drs Tozour, Bandremer, and Patberg, Mr Zavala, and Drs Chavez, Vintzileos, and Heo). Electronic address: jessica.tozour@nyulangone.org.
Samantha BandremerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (Drs Tozour, Bandremer, and Patberg, Mr Zavala, and Drs Chavez, Vintzileos, and Heo).
Elizabeth PatbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (Drs Tozour, Bandremer, and Patberg, Mr Zavala, and Drs Chavez, Vintzileos, and Heo).
Jose ZavalaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (Drs Tozour, Bandremer, and Patberg, Mr Zavala, and Drs Chavez, Vintzileos, and Heo).
Meredith AkermanDepartment of Biostatistics, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (Mrs Akerman).
Martin ChavezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (Drs Tozour, Bandremer, and Patberg, Mr Zavala, and Drs Chavez, Vintzileos, and Heo).
Devin M MannDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (Dr Mann); Medical Center Information Technology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (Drs Mann, Testa, and Heo).
Paul A TestaMedical Center Information Technology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (Drs Mann, Testa, and Heo).
Anthony M VintzileosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (Drs Tozour, Bandremer, and Patberg, Mr Zavala, and Drs Chavez, Vintzileos, and Heo).
Hye J HeoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (Drs Tozour, Bandremer, and Patberg, Mr Zavala, and Drs Chavez, Vintzileos, and Heo); Medical Center Information Technology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (Drs Mann, Testa, and Heo).
Island Hospital · USNYU Langone Health · USLong Island University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelemedicine in obstetrics has mostly been described in the rural areas that have limited access to subspecialties. During the COVID-19 pandemic, health systems rapidly expanded telemedicine services for urgent and nonurgent healthcare delivery, even in urban settings. The New York University health system implemented a prompt systemwide expansion of video-enabled telemedicine visits, increasing telemedicine to >8000 visits daily within 6 weeks of the beginning of the pandemic. There are limited studies that explore patient and provider satisfaction of telemedicine visits in obstetrical patients during the COVID-19 epidemic, particularly in the United States.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate both the patients' and the providers' satisfaction with the administration of maternal-fetal medicine services through telemedicine and to identify the factors that drive the patients' desire for future obstetrical telemedicine services. STUDY

designA cross-sectional survey was administered to patients who completed a telemedicine video visit with the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine at the New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island from March 19, 2020, to May 26, 2020. A 10-question survey assessing the patients' digital experience and desire for future use was either administered by telephone or self-administered by the patients via a link after obtaining verbal consent. The survey responses were scored from 1-strongly disagree to 5-strongly agree. We analyzed the demographics and survey responses of the patients who agreed to vs those who answered neutral or disagree to the question "I would like telehealth to be an option for future obstetric visits." The providers also answered a similar 10-question survey. The median scores were compared using appropriate tests. A P value of <.05 was considered significant.

resultsA total of 253 patients participated in 433 telemedicine visits, and 165 patients completed the survey, resulting in a 65% survey response rate. Overall, there were high rates of patient satisfaction in all areas assessed. Those who desired future telemedicine had significantly greater agreeability that they were able to see and hear their provider easily (5 [4.5, 5] vs 5 [4, 5]; P=.014) and that the lack of physical activity was not an issue (5 [4, 5] vs 5 [4, 5]; P=.032). They were also more likely to agree that the telemedicine visits were as good as in-person visits (4 [3, 5] vs 3 [2, 3]; P<.001) and that telehealth made it easier for them to see doctors or specialists (5 [4, 5] vs 3 [2, 3]; P<.001). The patients seeking consults for poor obstetrical history were more likely to desire future telemedicine compared with other visit types (19 (90%) vs 2 (10%); P=.05). Provider survey responses also demonstrated high levels of satisfaction, with 83% agreeing that they would like telemedicine to be an option for future obstetrical visits.

conclusionWe demonstrated that maternal-fetal medicine obstetrical patients and providers were highly satisfied with the implementation of telemedicine during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and a majority of them desire telemedicine as an option for future visits. A patient's desire for future telemedicine visits was significantly affected by their digital experience, the perception of a lack of need for physical contact, perceived time saved on travel, and access to healthcare providers. Health systems need to continue to improve healthcare delivery and invest in innovative solutions to conduct physical examinations remotely.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPandemicsPerinatologyPregnancySARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19maternal-fetal medicinepractice managementtelehealthtelemedicinevideo visit

Identifiers

PMID34450341
PMCPMC8454236
OpenAlexW3194388600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.