ArticlePractical radiation oncology
Synthetic Computed Tomography Generation from 0.35T Magnetic Resonance Images for Magnetic Resonance-Only Radiation Therapy Planning Using Perceptual Loss Models.
Article in Practical radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic literature review: deep learning techniques for synthetic medical image generation and their applications in radiotherapy.Frontiers in radiology · 2024Pooled it
- MR-linac: role of artificial intelligence and automation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025Review
- RobMedNAS: searching robust neural network architectures for medical image synthesis.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2024Article
- A body mass index-based method for "MR-only" abdominal MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluation of MRI-only based online adaptive radiotherapy of abdominal region on MR-linac.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Research progress on deep learning in magnetic resonance imaging-based diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a review on the current status and perspectives.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Synthetic computed tomography generation for abdominal adaptive radiotherapy using low-field magnetic resonance imaging.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Synthetic computed tomography for low-field magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy in the abdomen.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2022Article
- Emergence of MR-Linac in Radiation Oncology: Successes and Challenges of Riding on the MRgRT Bandwagon.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides excellent soft-tissue contrast, which makes it useful for delineating tumor and normal structures in radiation therapy planning, but MRI cannot readily provide electron density for dose calculation. Computed tomography (CT) is used but introduces registration uncertainty between MRI and CT. Previous studies have shown that synthetic CTs (sCTs) can be generated directly from MRI images with deep learning methods. However, mainly high-field MRI images have been validated. This study tested whether acceptable sCTs for MR-only radiation therapy planning can be synthesized using an integrated MR-guided linear accelerator at 0.35T, using MRI images and treatment plans in the liver region. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two models were investigated in this study: a convolutional neural network (Unet) with conventional mean square error (MSE) loss and a Unet using a secondary convolutional neural network for perceptual loss. A total of 37 cases were used in this study with 10-fold cross validation, and 37 treatment plans were generated and evaluated for target coverage and dose to organs at risk (OARs) in the MSE loss model, perceptual loss model, and original CT.
resultsThe sCTs predicted by the perceptual loss model had improved subjective visual quality compared with those predicted by the MSE loss model, but both were similar in mean absolute error (MAE), peak-signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and normalized cross-correlation (NCC). The MAE, PSNR, and NCC for the perceptual loss model were 35.64, 24.11, and 0.9539, respectively, and those for the MSE loss model were 35.67, 24.36, and 0.9566, respectively. No significant differences in target coverage and dose to OARs were found between the sCT predicted by the perceptual loss model or by the MSE model and the original CT image.
conclusionsThis study indicated that a Unet with both MSE loss and perceptual loss models can be used for generating sCT images from a 0.35T integrated MR linear accelerator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.