Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34450088›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2021

The what and when of olfactory working memory in humans.

Andrew I Yang, Gulce N Dikecligil, Heidi Jiang, Sandhitsu R Das, Joel M Stein, Stephan U Schuele, Joshua M Rosenow, Kathryn A Davis, Timothy H Lucas, Jay A Gottfried

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew I YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: iyang.and@gmail.com.
Gulce N DikecligilDepartment of Psychology, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Heidi JiangDepartment of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Sandhitsu R DasDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Joel M SteinDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Stephan U SchueleDepartment of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Joshua M RosenowDepartment of Neurosurgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Kathryn A DavisDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Timothy H LucasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Jay A GottfriedDepartment of Psychology, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: jaygottf@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Spatiotemporal Mechanisms of Olfactory Processing in the Human BrainR01DC018075 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GOTTFRIED, JAY A · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Encoding and retaining novel sequences of sensory stimuli in working memory is crucial for adaptive behavior. A fundamental challenge for the central nervous system is to maintain each sequence item in an active and discriminable state, while also preserving their temporal context. Nested neural oscillations have been postulated to disambiguate the "what" and "when" of sequences, but the mechanisms by which these multiple streams of information are coordinated in the human brain remain unclear. Drawing from foundational animal studies, we recorded local field potentials from the human piriform cortex and hippocampus during a working memory task in which subjects experienced sequences of three distinct odors. Our data revealed a unique organization of odor memories across multiple timescales of the theta rhythm. During encoding, odors elicited greater gamma at distinct theta phases in both regions, time stamping their positions in the sequence, whereby the robustness of this effect was predictive of temporal order memory. During maintenance, stimulus-driven patterns of theta-coupled gamma were spontaneously reinstated in piriform cortex, recapitulating the order of the initial sequence. Replay events were time compressed across contiguous theta cycles, coinciding with periods of enhanced piriform-hippocampal theta-phase synchrony, and their prevalence forecasted subsequent recall accuracy on a trial-by-trial basis. Our data provide a novel link between endogenous replay orchestrated by the theta rhythm and short-term retention of sequential memories in the human brain.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermPiriform CortexAnimalsHippocampusHumansSmellTheta RhythmECoGgammahippocampusiEEGolfactionphase amplitude couplingpiriform cortexreplaythetaworking memory

Identifiers

PMID34450088
PMCPMC8551054
OpenAlexW3195579078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.