Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34449939›Full record

Trial reportAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2022

Ketamine administration for acute painful sickle cell crisis: A randomized controlled trial.

Mohammed S Alshahrani, Amal H AlSulaibikh, Mohamed R ElTahan, Sukayna Z AlFaraj, Laila P Asonto, Abdullah A AlMulhim, Murad F AlAbbad, Nisreen Almaghraby, Mohammed A AlJumaan, Thamir O AlJunaid and 16 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Ketamine administration for acute painful sickle cell crisis: A randomized controlled trial.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Beyond IV push: alternative methods for management of acute pain in SCD.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pragmatic clinical trial design in emergency medicine: Study considerations and design types.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammed S AlshahraniEmergency and Critical Care Departments, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5946-2128
Amal H AlSulaibikhEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0247-0877
Mohamed R ElTahanAnesthesiology Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9730-6406
Sukayna Z AlFarajEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Laila P AsontoEmergency and Critical Care Departments, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9239-9650
Abdullah A AlMulhimEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Murad F AlAbbadEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Nisreen AlmaghrabyEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed A AlJumaanEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0360-1632
Thamir O AlJunaidEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Moath N DarweeshEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Faisal M AlHawajEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Alaa M MahmoudEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Bader K AlossaimiEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Shaikhah K AlotaibiEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Talal M AlMutairiEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Duaa A AlSulaiman PharmDPharmacy Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Dunya AlfarajEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Reem AlhawwasEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Lawrence MbuagbawDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5855-5461
Kim LewisDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Madeleine VerhovsekDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5022-9765
Mark CrowtherDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Gordon GuyattDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Waleed AlhazzaniDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8076-9626
GUIDE Group
King Fahd Hospital of the University · SAImpact · CAMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-dose ketamine infusion in adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) who presented with acute sickle vasoocclusive crisis (VOC).

methodsThis study was a parallel-group, prospective, randomized, double-blind, pragmatic trial. Participants were randomized to receive a single dose of either ketamine or morphine, infused over 30 min. Primary outcome was mean difference in the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) score over 2 h. NPRS was recorded every 30 min for a maximum of 180 min and secondary outcomes were cumulative dose of opioids, emergency department (ED) length of stay, hospital admission, change in vital signs, and drug-related side effects. Authors performed the analysis using intention-to-treat principle.

resultA total of 278 adults with SCD and who presented with acute sickle VOC participated in this trial. A total of 138 were allocated to the ketamine group. Mean (±standard deviation [SD]) NPRS scores over 2 h were 5.7 (±2.13) and 5.6 (±1.90) in the ketamine and morphine groups. The ketamine group received significantly lower cumulative doses of morphine during their ED stay (mean ± SD = 4.5 ± 4.6 mg) than of the morphine group (mean ± SD = 8.5 ± 7.55 mg). Both groups had similar rates of hospital admission: 6.3% in the ketamine group had drug-related side effects compared to 2.2% in the morphine group.

conclusionEarly use of ketamine in adults with VOC resulted in a meaningful reduction in pain scores over a 2-h period and reduced the cumulative morphine dose in the ED with no significant drug-related side effects in the ketamine-treated group.

Indexed as

Acute PainAnemia, Sickle CellKetamineAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidDouble-Blind MethodHumansMorphinePain MeasurementProspective StudiesAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidKetamineMorphine

Identifiers

PMID34449939
PMCPMC9292870
OpenAlexW3193410192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.