Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34449835›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2021

Mechanical competition alters the cellular interpretation of an endogenous genetic program.

Sourabh Bhide, Denisa Gombalova, Gregor Mönke, Johannes Stegmaier, Valentyna Zinchenko, Anna Kreshuk, Julio M Belmonte, Maria Leptin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recoil Measurements inBio-protocol · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Cellular segregation in cocultures is driven by differential adhesion and contractility on distinct timescales.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sourabh BhideDirector's Research Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3662-9033
Denisa Gombalova *Director's Research Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9316-3834
Gregor Mönke *Director's Research Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Johannes StegmaierInstitute of Imaging and Computer Vision, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4072-3759
Valentyna ZinchenkoCollaboration for Joint PhD Degree between European Molecular Biology Laboratory and Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6900-0656
Anna KreshukCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Julio M BelmonteDepartment of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-4315-9631
Maria LeptinDirector's Research Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7097-348X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intrinsic genetic program of a cell is not sufficient to explain all of the cell's activities. External mechanical stimuli are increasingly recognized as determinants of cell behavior. In the epithelial folding event that constitutes the beginning of gastrulation in Drosophila, the genetic program of the future mesoderm leads to the establishment of a contractile actomyosin network that triggers apical constriction of cells and thereby tissue folding. However, some cells do not constrict but instead stretch, even though they share the same genetic program as their constricting neighbors. We show here that tissue-wide interactions force these cells to expand even when an otherwise sufficient amount of apical, active actomyosin is present. Models based on contractile forces and linear stress-strain responses do not reproduce experimental observations, but simulations in which cells behave as ductile materials with nonlinear mechanical properties do. Our models show that this behavior is a general emergent property of actomyosin networks in a supracellular context, in accordance with our experimental observations of actin reorganization within stretching cells.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonActinsActomyosinAnimalsCell ShapeCytoskeletonDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGastrulationMesodermActinsActomyosinDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID34449835
PMCPMC8406609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.