Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34449802›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

X-ray computed tomography for non-invasive dendrochronology reveals a concealed double panelling on a painting from Rubens' studio.

Marta Domínguez-Delmás, Francien G Bossema, Jan Dorscheid, Sophia Bethany Coban, Moorea Hall-Aquitania, K Joost Batenburg, Erma Hermens

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marta Domínguez-DelmásDepartment of History of Art, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8716-0258
Francien G BossemaDepartment of Conservation and Science, Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jan DorscheidDepartment of Conservation and Science, Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sophia Bethany CobanComputational Imaging Group, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Moorea Hall-AquitaniaDepartment of History of Art, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
K Joost BatenburgComputational Imaging Group, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Erma HermensDepartment of History of Art, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Rijksmuseum · NLCentrum Wiskunde & Informatica · NLLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dating the wood from historical art objects is a crucial step to ascertain their production time, and support or refute attribution to an artist or a workshop. Dendrochronology is commonly used for this purpose but requires access to the tree-ring pattern in the wood, which can be hindered by preparatory layers, polychromy, wax, or integrated frames. Here we implemented non-invasive dendrochronology based on X-ray computed tomography (CT) to examine a painting on panel attributed to Rubens' studio and its presumed dating around 1636 CE. The CT images achieved a resolution of 37.3 micron and revealed a double panelling, which was concealed by oak strips covering all four edges. The back (visible) board is made of deciduous oak (Quercus subg. Quercus), the most common type of wood used in 17th-century Netherlandish workshops, and was dated terminus post quem after 1557 CE. However, the front (original) board used for the painting has been identified through examination of the wood anatomy as a tropical wood, probably Swietenia sp., a species seldom used in Netherlandish paintings, and remains undated. Its very presence attests the global character of 17th-century trade, and demonstrates the use of exotic species in Flemish studios. The date of the oak board refutes previous results and suggests that this board was trimmed to meet the size of the tropical one, having been glued to it for conservation purposes or with deceiving intentions to pretend that the painting was made on an oak panel. These revelations have opened new lines of art historical inquiry and highlight the potential of X-ray CT as a powerful tool for non-invasive study of historical art objects to retrieve their full history.

Indexed as

PaintingsHistory, 17th CenturyQuercusRadiometric DatingTomography, X-Ray ComputedWood

Identifiers

PMID34449802
PMCPMC8396786
OpenAlexW3195389617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.