Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34449789›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Reduced genetic variability in a captive-bred population of the endangered Hume's pheasant (Syrmaticus humiae, Hume 1881) revealed by microsatellite genotyping and D-loop sequencing.

Jitmat Thintip, Worapong Singchat, Syed Farhan Ahmad, Nattakan Ariyaraphong, Narongrit Muangmai, Wiyada Chamchumroon, Klinsak Pitiwong, Warong Suksavate, Sutee Duangjai, Prateep Duengkae and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jitmat ThintipFaculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Biology, Special Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Worapong SingchatFaculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Biology, Special Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Syed Farhan AhmadFaculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Biology, Special Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nattakan AriyaraphongFaculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Biology, Special Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Narongrit MuangmaiFaculty of Science, Animal Genomics and Bioresource Research Center (AGB), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wiyada ChamchumroonDepartment of National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Bangkok, Thailand.
Klinsak PitiwongDepartment of National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Bangkok, Thailand.
Warong SuksavateFaculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Biology, Special Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sutee DuangjaiFaculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Biology, Special Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Prateep DuengkaeFaculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Biology, Special Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kornsorn SrikulnathFaculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Biology, Special Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5985-7258
Kasetsart University · THHiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Captive breeding programs are crucial to ensure the survival of endangered species and ultimately to reintroduce individuals into the wild. However, captive-bred populations can also deteriorate due to inbreeding depression and reduction of genetic variability. We genotyped a captive population of 82 individuals of the endangered Hume's pheasant (Syrmaticus humiae, Hume 1881) at the Doi Tung Wildlife Breeding Center to assess the genetic consequences associated with captive breeding. Analysis of microsatellite loci and mitochondrial D-loop sequences reveal significantly reduced genetic differentiation and a shallow population structure. Despite the low genetic variability, no bottleneck was observed but 12 microsatellite loci were informative in reflecting probable inbreeding. These findings provide a valuable source of knowledge to maximize genetic variability and enhance the success of future conservation plans for captive and wild populations of Hume's pheasant.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesAnimalsAnimals, WildBreedingGenetic VariationGenotypeHaplotypesInbreedingMicrosatellite RepeatsQuail

Identifiers

PMID34449789
PMCPMC8396778
OpenAlexW3195767389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.