Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34449780›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

STEM undergraduates' perspectives of instructor and university responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Spring 2020.

Sherry Pagoto, Kathrine A Lewis, Laurie Groshon, Lindsay Palmer, Molly E Waring, Deja Workman, Nina De Luna, Nathanial P Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. COVID-19 pandemic effects on trajectories of college students' stress, coping, and sleep quality: A four-year longitudinal analysis.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Shifting online during COVID-19: A systematic review of teaching and learning strategies and their outcomes.International journal of educational technology in higher education · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sherry PagotoDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2462-8797
Kathrine A LewisDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Laurie GroshonDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.
Lindsay PalmerDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5415-9186
Molly E WaringDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.
Deja WorkmanDepartment of Mathematics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Nina De LunaDepartment of Mathematics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Nathanial P BrownDepartment of Mathematics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Funding

Mentoring in mHealth and Social Networking Interventions for CVD Risk ReductionK24HL124366 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI PAGOTO, SHERRY L. · 2015 to 2024
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL124366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe examined undergraduate STEM students' experiences during Spring 2020 when universities switched to remote instruction due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, we sought to understand actions by universities and instructors that students found effective or ineffective, as well as instructor behaviors that conveyed a sense of caring or not caring about their students' success.

methodsIn July 2020 we conducted 16 focus groups with STEM undergraduate students enrolled in US colleges and universities (N = 59). Focus groups were stratified by gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Content analyses were performed using a data-driven inductive approach.

resultsParticipants (N = 59; 51% female) were racially/ethnically diverse (76% race/ethnicity other than non-Hispanic white) and from 32 colleges and universities. The most common effective instructor strategies mentioned included hybrid instruction (35%) and use of multiple tools for learning and student engagement (27%). The most common ineffective strategies mentioned were increasing the course workload or difficulty level (18%) and use of pre-recorded lectures (15%). The most common behaviors cited as making students feel the instructor cared about their success were exhibiting leniency and/or flexibility regarding course policies or assessments (29%) and being responsive and accessible to students (25%). The most common behaviors cited as conveying the instructors did not care included poor communication skills (28%) and increasing the difficulty of the course (15%). University actions students found helpful included flexible policies (41%) and moving key services online (e.g., tutoring, counseling; 24%). Students felt universities should have created policies for faculty and departments to increase consistency (26%) and ensured communication strategies were honest, prompt, and transparent (23%).

conclusionsTo be prepared for future emergencies, universities should devise evidence-based policies for remote operations and all instructors should be trained in best practices for remote instruction. Research is needed to identify and ameliorate negative impacts of the pandemic on STEM education.

Indexed as

AdultCOVID-19Educational PersonnelEducation, DistanceFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePandemicsPolicySARS-CoV-2StudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34449780
PMCPMC8396789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.