Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34449652›Full record

ArticleJournal of developmental biology2021

The Review of the Autotomy of Agamid Lizards with Considerations about the Types of Autotomy and Regeneration.

Natalia Borisovna Ananjeva, Dmitry Anatolyevich Gordeev, Dmitry Vyacheslavovich Korost

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalia Borisovna AnanjevaZoological Institute of RAS, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Dmitry Anatolyevich GordeevInstitute of Natural Sciences, Department of Biology, Volgograd State University, 400062 Volgograd, Russia.
Dmitry Vyacheslavovich KorostDepartment of Geology and Geochemistry of Fossil Fuels, Faculty of Geology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8957-6871

Funding

Russian Foundation for Fundamental Investigations #18-04-00040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a review of the data on the intervertebral autotomy and regeneration of agamid lizards based on an analysis of information obtained over a 35-year period after the publication of thorough reviews (Arnold, 1984, 1988 and Bellairs, Bryant, 1985). It is supplemented by our own studies of 869 specimens of agamid lizards (Sauria, Agamidae) stored in the herpetological collections of the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg, Russia) and the Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University (Moscow, Russia), represented by 31 species of 16 genera. The manifestations of the ability for autotomy and regeneration in phylogenetic lineages within the family-Leiolepidinae, Amphibolurinae, Agaminae, Draconinae-are considered. A comparative morphological analysis of the structure of the caudal vertebrae was carried out using the Computer Microtomography Methods (micro-CT) in the following ecomorphological types of agama: (1) with developed abilities to caudal autotomy and regeneration, (2) with the ability to caudal autotomy but without regeneration and (3) without the ability to autotomy. The phenomenon of intervertebral autotomy (urotomy) in snakes is considered too. Possible ways of evolution of the ability to caudal autotomy as a defense strategy against predators are discussed in the phylogenetic context.

Indexed as

Agamidaecaudal autotomyevolutionOphidiaSquamataurotomy

Identifiers

PMID34449652
PMCPMC8395757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.