Evaluating the Consistency of Subjective Activity Assessments and Their Relation to Cognition in Older Adults.

Cassandra R Hatt, Christopher R Brydges, Jacqueline A Mogle, Martin J Sliwinski, Allison A M Bielak

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

4citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

Within- and Between-Person Differences in Activity Factor Structure: Results From an Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
Article
Alternating time spent on social interactions and solitude in healthy older adults.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2022
Article
New Trends in Cognitive Aging and Mild Cognitive Impairment.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
Article
Charting everyday activities in later life: Study protocol of the mobility, activity, and social interactions study (MOASIS).Frontiers in psychology · 2022
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cassandra R HattDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

Christopher R BrydgesNIH West Coast Metabolomics Center, UC Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5901-638X

Jacqueline A MogleCollege of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16801, USA.

Martin J SliwinskiPrevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16801, USA.

Allison A M BielakDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Research examining whether activity engagement is related to cognitive functioning in older adults has been limited to using retrospective reports of activity which may be affected by biases. This study compared two measurements (estimated weekly versus reported daily), and whether these activity assessments were related to cognition in older adults; (2) Methods: Participants from US (

Indexed as

aging adultscognitive performanceleisure activity engagementmeasurement of activity

Identifiers

PMID34449640

DOI10.3390/geriatrics6030074

PMCPMC8395599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.