Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34449497›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2021

Impact of the implementation of a standard for preanalytical handling of samples for microbiological diagnostics on the quality of results at a neurocritical care unit.

Martin Kieninger, Andreas Mandlinger, Nina Doblinger, Bärbel Kieninger, Sylvia Bele, Bernd Salzberger, Wulf Schneider-Brachert, Bernhard Graf, Florian Zeman, Thomas Holzmann

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sterility testing of germ-free mouse colonies.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin KieningerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany.
Andreas MandlingerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany.
Nina DoblingerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany.
Bärbel KieningerDepartment of Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany.
Sylvia BeleDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany.
Bernd SalzbergerDepartment of Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany.
Wulf Schneider-BrachertDepartment of Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany.
Bernhard GrafDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany.
Florian ZemanCenter for Clinical Studies, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany.
Thomas HolzmannDepartment of Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractAntibiotic stewardship (ABS) programs intend to improve outcomes of nosocomial infections and to counteract the emergence of further antimicrobial resistances. At the anesthesiologic-neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Medical Center Regensburg (Germany) we implemented a standard operating procedure (SOP) with clear instructions for the preanalytical handling and storage of microbiological samples. We intended to find out whether the instructions given in the SOP led to a higher rate of ideal material being sent to the laboratory and to overall better quality of the received results.We retraced retrospectively all samples taken in cases of suspected pneumonia, urinary tract infection, bloodstream infection, catheter infection associated with a central venous or arterial catheter and ventriculitis due to external ventricular drainage as well as all smears taken for the screening for multi-resistant bacteria within a time period of 1 year before to 1 year after the implementation of the SOP.In the case of suspected pneumonia and urinary tract infection, large amounts of ideal material were sent to the microbiological laboratory. A remarkable improvement after the implementation of the SOP, however, could only be observed regarding the number of urine samples taken from older urinary catheters, which was significantly lower in the "SOP group". Samples for microbiological diagnostics were taken much more often in the daytime, although storage of the probes did not lead to worse results.Concrete instructions enable adequate preanalytical handling of microbiological probes. However, we could not recognize substantial improvements probably due to a preexisting high process quality on the ICU. Microbiological diagnostics during the night shift has to be improved.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipClinical ProtocolsCross InfectionGermanyHumansIntensive Care UnitsMicrobiological TechniquesNeurosurgeryRetrospective StudiesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID34449497
PMCPMC10545238
OpenAlexW3195439192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.