ArticleGenes & genomics2021
Phosphorylation of BIK1 is critical for interaction with downstream signaling components.
Article in Genes & genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of Tyrosine Phosphorylation in PEP1 Receptor 1(PEPR1) inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development specifies, diversifies and empowers root immunity.EMBO reports · 2022Review
- Identification of Feronia-interacting proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana.Genes & genomics · 2022Article
- Mechanisms of plant cell wall surveillance in response to pathogens, cell wall-derived ligands and the effect of expansins to infection resistance or susceptibility.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBotrytis-induced Kinase 1 (BIK1) is a receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase (RLCK) involved in the defense, growth, and development of higher plants. It interacts with various receptor-like kinases (RLKs) such as Brassinosteroid Insensitive 1 (BRI1), Flagellin Sensitive 2 (FLS2), and Perception of the Arabidopsis Danger Signal Peptide 1 (PEPR1), but little is known about signaling downstream of BIK1.
objectiveIn this study, we aimed to identify Arabidopsis thaliana BIK1 (AtBIK1) and Brassica rapa BIK1 (BrBIK1) interacting proteins, which is downstream signaling components in Arabidopsis. In addition, the effect of BIK1 phosphorylation on their interaction were examined.
methodsFor yeast two hybrid (Y2H) screening, a B. rapa cDNA activation domain (AD) library and an A. thaliana cDNA library were used. Reverse reaction (LR) recombinations of appropriate open reading frames (AtBIK1, BrBIK1, AtRGP2, AtPATL2, AtPP7) in either pDONR207 or pDONR/zeo were performed with the split-YFP destination vectors pDEST-GWVYNE and pDEST-GWVYCE to generate N- or C-terminal fusions with the N- and C-terminal yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) moieties, respectively. Recombined vectors were transformed into Agrobacterium strain GV3101. The described GST-AtBIK1, Flag-AtBIK1, and Flag-BrBIK1 constructs were used as templates for site-directed mutagenesis with a QuikChange XL Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene).
resultsIn results, A. thaliana BIK1 (AtBIK1) displays strong autophosphorylation kinase activity on tyrosine and threonine residues, whereas B. rapa BIK1 (BrBIK1) does not exhibit autophosphorylation kinase activity in vitro. Herein, we demonstrated that four proteins (RGP2, PATL2, PP7, and SULTR4.1) interact with BrBIK1 but not AtBIK1 in a Y2H system. To confirm interactions between BIK1 and protein candidates in Nicotiana benthamiana, BiFC analysis was performed and it was found that only BrBIK1 bound the three proteins tested. Three phosphosites, T90, T362, and T368, based on amino acid sequence alignment between AtBIK1 and BrBIK1, and performed site-directed mutagenesis (SDM) on AtBIK1 and BrBIK. S90T, P362T, and A369T mutations in BrBIK1 restored autophosphorylation kinase activity on threonine residues comparable to AtBIK1. However, T90A, T362P, and T368A mutations in AtBIK1 did not alter autophosphorylation kinase activity on threonine residues compared with wild-type AtBIK1. BiFC results showed that BIK1 mutations restored kinase activity led to the loss of the binding activity to RGP2, PATL2, or PP7 proteins.
conclusionPhospho-BIK1 might be involved in plant innate immunity, while non-phospho BIK1 may regulate plant growth and development through interactions with RGP2, PATL2, and PP7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.