ArticleInternational journal of hematology2022
Mutational landscape of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and its potential clinical significance.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Epigenetic alterations in Myeloid Malignancies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Mutational Spectrum and Clinical Outcomes of Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Single-Institution Study in Korea with Emphasis onJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The impact of SETBP1 mutations in neurological diseases and cancer.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We evaluated the mutational landscape of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and its potential clinical significance. We analyzed 47 samples with a panel of 112 genes using next-generation sequencing. Forty-five of the 47 patients (95.74%) had at least one mutation identified, with an average of 3.7 (range 0-9) per patient. The most common mutation was NRAS, followed by ASXL1, TET2, SRSF2, RUNX1, KRAS, and SETBP1. Patients 60 years and older more frequently had mutations in TET2 (56% vs. 9.09%, P = 0.001) and ASXL1 (48% vs. 18.18%, P = 0.031) than patients younger than 60 years. Median overall survival (OS) in patients with CMML was 22.0 months (95% CI 19.7-24.3 months). ASXL1 (18 vs. 22 months, P = 0.012), RUNX1 (17 vs. 22 months, P = 0.001), and SETBP1 (20 vs. 27 months, P = 0.032) mutations predicted inferior OS. However, only RUNX1 mutation was significantly associated with inferior acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-free survival. Our data showed that mutation profile differed significantly between CMML patients aged 60 years and older versus those younger than 60 years, and some of these mutations impact the progression and prognosis of the disease to a certain extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.