Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34448915›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2023

[Acceptance of video consultation among patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases depends on gender and location-Results of an online survey among patients and physicians].

Diana Vossen, Johannes Knitza, Philipp Klemm, Isabell Haase, Johanna Mucke, Anna Kernder, Marco Meyer, Arnd Kleyer, Philipp Sewerin, Gerlinde Bendzuck and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Digital Approaches for Myositis.Current rheumatology reports · 2023
    Review
  5. [Digitalization in urology-challenge and opportunity].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Diana VossenRheinisches Rheumazentrum Meerbusch, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Hauptstr. 74-76, 40668, Meerbusch, Deutschland. diana.vossen@rrz-meerbusch.de.
Johannes KnitzaArbeitsgemeinschaft Junge Rheumatologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Philipp KlemmArbeitsgemeinschaft Junge Rheumatologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Isabell HaaseArbeitsgemeinschaft Junge Rheumatologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Johanna MuckeArbeitsgemeinschaft Junge Rheumatologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Anna KernderArbeitsgemeinschaft Junge Rheumatologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Marco MeyerArbeitsgemeinschaft Junge Rheumatologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Arnd KleyerArbeitsgemeinschaft Junge Rheumatologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Philipp SewerinArbeitsgemeinschaft Junge Rheumatologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Gerlinde BendzuckDeutsche Rheuma-Liga Bundesverband e. V., Bonn, Deutschland.
Sabine EisDeutsche Rheuma-Liga Bundesverband e. V., Bonn, Deutschland.
Martin KruscheArbeitsgemeinschaft Junge Rheumatologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Harriet MorfArbeitsgemeinschaft Junge Rheumatologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie · DEDeutsche Rheuma-Liga · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHNO Bad Bramstedt · DEKerckhoff Klinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn order to successfully integrate telemedicine into the daily routine of rheumatology, both the patient's and the physician's perspective are important. For this purpose, a detailed study by means of a web-based survey was conducted by the Working Group Young Rheumatology (AGJR) of the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) and the German Rheumatism League National Association. By means of subgroup analysis of the data regarding video consultation, the aim was now to find out which requirements and wishes patients and physicians have for video consultations.

methodsThe prospective survey was distributed via social media, QR code and email. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis related to video consultation were performed and correlations were shown.

resultsThe data indicated positive attitudes toward video consultation on the part of both patients (n = 299) and rheumatologists (n = 129). A correlation between age and positive opinion of the video consultation was found among the patients (r = 0.161, p = 0.006), especially among female patients a positive approval of the video consultation was found with increasing age (r = 0.244, p < 0.001 to male patients: r = -0.190, p = 0.145). Regarding the travelling time to the treating rheumatologist, male patients found the video consultation more attractive with increasing travelling time (r = 0.229, p = 0.078). With respect to the wishes of patients and physicians, video consultation should be used primarily for follow-up or emergency appointments. Video consultation for initial appointments, on the other hand, was very rarely mentioned.

conclusionDuring the COVID 19 pandemic, video consultation was increasingly popular among rheumatology patients as well as among rheumatologists.

Indexed as

COVID-19Rheumatic DiseasesRheumatic FeverRheumatologyTelemedicineFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRheumatologistsCOVID-19 pandemicOnline surveyPatient careRheumatic inflammatory systemic diseasesVideo consultation

Identifiers

PMID34448915
PMCPMC8391858
OpenAlexW3195181920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.