Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34448886›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2022

[Risk management in the triage of emergency room patients to outpatient care : Manchester Triage System and CEReCo-blue as a tool for low-risk patient management in integrated emergency centers].

Dirk Pabst, Jonas Schibensky, David Fistera, Joachim Riße, Clemens Kill, Carola Holzner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Redirection of patients from the emergency department to ambulatory care: a feasibility study].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dirk PabstZentrum für Notfallmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland. dirk.pabst@uk-essen.de.
Jonas SchibenskyZentrum für Notfallmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
David FisteraZentrum für Notfallmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Joachim RißeZentrum für Notfallmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Clemens KillZentrum für Notfallmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Carola HolznerZentrum für Notfallmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Essen University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSo-called "integrated emergency centers (IEC)" are going to be implemented in German hospitals and will be the first contact point in the emergency care setting. For early decision-making whether outpatient care or inpatient admission in the emergency department is indicated, it would be helpful to have a system to identify patients for outpatient treatment. In this study, we investigated whether the Manchester Triage System (MTS) is suitable for identifying patients who can be safely referred to emergency room patients to outpatient care.

methodsPatients in the emergency department of the "blue" MTS level were examined for the endpoint inpatient admission and were compared with the next higher MTS category "green". In a second step, the "blue" MTS category was examined for the most common criteria leading to inpatient admission.

resultsAfter excluding patients who were presented by the emergency medical services (EMS) or after prior medical consultation, the rate of inpatient admissions in the blue MTS category was significantly lower than in the green category (10.8% vs 29.0%). The rate could be reduced to 0.9% by establishing a subgroup with the additional exclusion criteria chronic disorder and readmission after prior inpatient treatment (CEReCo-blue group: Chronic Disorder (C), Emergency Medical Service (E), Readmission (R), Prior Medical Consultation (Co)).

conclusionThe blue MTS category does not appear to be suitable for the selection of patients with indication for outpatient treatment. We propose the introduction of a subgroup, the so-called CEReCo-blue group, which could be helpful for the selection of this patient group.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesTriageAmbulatory CareEmergency Service, HospitalHumansRisk ManagementEmergency counterEmergency medicineHospital admissionOutpatientsPrimary assessment

Identifiers

PMID34448886
PMCPMC9452430
OpenAlexW3199234550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.