Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34448834›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2022

Post-implementation perspectives on smokefree prison policy: a qualitative study with staff and people in custody.

Ashley Brown, Danielle Mitchell, Kate Hunt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Integrated Safety and Health Promotion among Correctional Workers and People Incarcerated: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. An Evaluation of the Impact of a Multicomponent Stop Smoking Intervention in an Irish Prison.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashley BrownInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2307-5916
Danielle MitchellInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8692-5407
Kate HuntInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5873-3632

Funding

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (Public Health Research Programme 15/55/44
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA comprehensive smokefree prison policy (SFPP) was introduced in Scottish prisons from November 2018, reflecting concern about inequalities in occupational exposures to second-hand smoke (SHS) and tobacco-related harms among people in custody (PiC). We aimed to address a gap, whereby few studies have sought to understand SFPP from the perspectives of people living and working in prisons.

methodsAs part of a comprehensive evaluation, focus groups and interviews with staff (n = 99) and interviews with PiC (n = 23) were conducted 6-9 months post-implementation of SFPP in Scotland. Data were analysed using the framework approach.

resultsOur study found that new restrictions on smoking had been widely accepted by PiC, after a period of adjustment which was less troublesome than participants had anticipated. Benefits of the SFPP for the safety and comfort of staff and PiC who were no longer exposed to SHS, and additionally for the health of PiC who were now smoking-abstinent, were widely acknowledged. Drawbacks of the SFPP, such as difficulties managing without tobacco and use of alternatives (e.g. e-cigarettes and changes in use of illegal drugs), were also reported. Contraband tobacco was not reported to be a major problem following prisons becoming smokefree.

conclusionsThe findings strengthen evidence that SFPPs can be implemented without causing major disruption and highlight the need for removal of tobacco to be underpinned by careful planning, partnership working and ensuring the availability of support for smokers. Experiences from Scotland may be of interest and some comfort, internationally for jurisdictions considering smoke-free rules in prisons.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoke-Free PolicyTobacco Smoke PollutionHumansPrisonsSmokersTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID34448834
PMCPMC8807073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.