Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34448821›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

Scheimpflug-Based Analysis of the Reflectivity of the Cornea in Marfan Syndrome.

Michèle Tack, Elke O Kreps, Julie De Zaeytijd, Alejandra Consejo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Corneal tissue changes following short-term soft contact lens wear of different materials.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2023
    Article
  5. Influence of eye tilt on corneal densitometry.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Michèle TackDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Elke O KrepsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Julie De ZaeytijdDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Alejandra ConsejoDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Ghent University Hospital · BEUniversidad de Zaragoza · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to investigate corneal reflectivity in Marfan syndrome (MFS) on the basis of Scheimpflug light intensity distribution. Methods: In a retrospective case-control analysis, the left eyes of 40 MFS patients and 40 age- and refraction-matched healthy controls were investigated. Patients with MFS meeting the Ghent II diagnostic criteria and with genetic confirmation of disease were included. Exclusion criteria were the following: coexisting corneal, conjunctival, or scleral pathology; use of medication known to affect corneal transparency; history of ocular surgery; and insufficient data. Scheimpflug tomography images were exported to analyze corneal transparency in different corneal layers and regions. Each corneal image was automatically segmented, after which the corresponding pixel intensities in the defined regions of interest were statistically modeled using a Weibull probability density function from which parameters α (transparency) and β (homogeneity) were derived. Results: The cornea in MFS showed significantly higher light reflectivity (overall cornea, α = 71 ± 17 arbitrary units (a.u.)) than in the control group (overall cornea, α = 59 ± 15 a.u.) (t test, P = 0.003). The α parameter was significantly higher in MFS eyes in all examined layers and regions (P < 0.05), whereas the β parameter showed no statistical difference between MFS and controls (P > 0.05). The difference in α did not correlate with ocular biometric properties (corneal thickness and curvature) or ectopia lentis (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The cornea in MFS shows significantly higher reflectivity than healthy controls with similar levels of homogeneity. Translational Relevance: The proposed methodology detects corneal reflectivity changes in MFS not available from regular slit-lamp examination.

Indexed as

Ectopia LentisMarfan SyndromeBiometryCorneaHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34448821
PMCPMC8399399
OpenAlexW3195495743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.