Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34448719›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Podcasts for the Delivery of Medical Education and Remote Learning.

Julliana Newman, Andrew Liew, Jon Bowles, Kelly Soady, Steven Inglis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Triple-S framework: ensuring scalable, sustainable, and serviceable practices in educational technology.International journal of educational technology in higher education · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julliana NewmanGilead Sciences, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1991-6927
Andrew LiewOxford PharmaGenesis, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4792-9637
Jon BowlesOxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2071-580X
Kelly SoadyPharmaGenesis London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8274-7831
Steven InglisOxford PharmaGenesis, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1587-757X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Podcasts are increasingly being recognized as an effective platform to facilitate the continuous professional development (CPD) of health care professionals (HCPs). Compared with face-to-face meetings and other more traditional forms of CPD, podcasts allow for flexible learning and are less expensive to develop. Podcasts are at the cutting edge of digital education and can be an important element of a pharmaceutical company's multichannel communications plan to improve HCP engagement and CPD in specific therapy areas. However, developing a successful podcast can have significant challenges. In this viewpoint paper, we provide our perspectives on medical podcasts as a medium for educating HCPs in the digital age. We describe our experience in developing an HIV-focused podcast for Australian HCPs, creating a series that has now expanded to other therapy areas in several countries. Practical considerations and unique challenges associated with industry-sponsored podcasts are outlined. Overall, we believe that the process of developing a podcast can be a challenging but rewarding experience, and CPD delivered via podcasting should be more routinely considered by pharmaceutical companies.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalAustraliaHealth PersonnelHumansLearningcontinuous professional developmentdigitalhealth care professionalshepatitis C virushepatologyHIVpodcastsremote learningvirology

Identifiers

PMID34448719
PMCPMC8433939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.