Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34448701›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Factors That Help and Hinder the Implementation of Digital Depression Prevention Programs: School-Based Cross-sectional Study.

Joanne R Beames, Lara Johnston, Bridianne O'Dea, Michelle Torok, Helen Christensen, Katherine M Boydell, Aliza Werner-Seidler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. School-based screening for high blood pressure in children and adolescents: a systematic scoping review.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joanne R BeamesBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3630-0980
Lara JohnstonBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4658-3171
Bridianne O'DeaBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1731-210X
Michelle TorokBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3741-8075
Helen ChristensenBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0435-2065
Katherine M BoydellBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1464-8532
Aliza Werner-SeidlerBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9046-6159

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital prevention programs that are delivered in a school environment can inoculate young people against depression. However, little is known about the school-based factors that help and hinder the implementation of these programs. Staff members are integral for supporting mental health programs in schools and are likely to have a wealth of expertise and knowledge about the factors that affect implementation.

objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to explore the barriers and facilitators to implementing a digital depression prevention program in Australian secondary schools with teachers, counselors, and principals. The secondary objective was to explore variations in these factors across different school contexts, including the school type (government or nongovernment), location (capital city, regional/or rural areas), and socioeconomic status (SES) (low, medium, high).

methodsThis quantitative cross-sectional survey study assessed the barriers and facilitators to implementing a hypothetical digital prevention program in Australian schools. The survey was taken by 97 teachers (average age 38.3 years), 93 counselors (average age 39.5 years), and 11 principals (average age 50.9 years) across Australia between November 2017 and July 2018.

resultsA range of barriers and facilitators relating to logistics and resources, staff support, and program factors were endorsed by the surveyed staff. Consistent with prior research, common barriers included a lack of time and resources (ie, staff and rooms). These barriers were particularly evident in government, rural/regional, and low socioeconomic schools. Other barriers were specific to digital delivery, including privacy issues and a lack of clarity around staff roles and responsibilities. Facilitators included upskilling staff through training, embedding the program into the curriculum, and other program factors including universal delivery, screening of students' mental health, and clear referral pathways. Knowledge about the program efficacy was also perceived as important by a large proportion of the respondents.

conclusionsThe digital depression prevention program was perceived as suitable for use within different schools in Australia, although certain factors need to be considered to enable effective implementation. Logistics and resources, support, and program factors were identified as particularly important for school-based implementation. To maximize the effectiveness in delivering digital programs, implementation may need to be tailored to the staff roles and school types.

Indexed as

DepressionSchoolsAdolescentAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationSchool Health Servicesbarriercounselordepressiondigitalfacilitatorpreventionprincipalsecondary schoolstudentteacher

Identifiers

PMID34448701
PMCPMC8433863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.