Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34448487›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2021

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on family medicine residency training.

Nida S Awadallah, Angela S Czaja, Tyra Fainstad, Monica C McNulty, Kshama R Jaiswal, Teresa S Jones, Carol M Rumack

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nida S AwadallahDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5635-0454
Angela S CzajaDepartment of Pediatrics, Critical Care Division, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Tyra FainstadDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Monica C McNultyAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kshama R JaiswalDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Teresa S JonesDepartment of Graduate Medical Education, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Carol M RumackDepartment of Graduate Medical Education, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Denver · USOutcomes Research Consortium · US

Funding

NIH Prior Approval Process ProfessionalUL1TR002535 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2018 to 2022
$51.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535NIH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily physicians have played a unique clinical role during the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that the pandemic would be associated with significant deleterious effects on clinical activity, educational training, personal safety and well-being.

objectiveWe conducted a national survey to obtain preliminary data that would assist in future targeted data collection and subsequent evaluation of the impact of the pandemic on family medicine residents and teaching faculty.

methodsAn anonymous online survey of residents and faculty was distributed via the Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors list serve between 5/21/2020 and 6/18/2020. Survey questions focused on clinical and educational activities, safety and well-being.

resultsOne hundred and fifty-three residents and 151 teaching faculty participated in the survey. Decreased clinical activity was noted by 81.5% of residents and 80.9% of faculty and the majority began conducting telehealth visits (97.9% of residents, 91.0% of faculty). Distance learning platforms were used by all residents (100%) and 39.6% noted an overall positive impact on their education. Higher levels of burnout did not significantly correlate with reassignment of clinical duties (residents P = 0.164; faculty P = 0.064). Residents who showed significantly higher burnout scores (P = 0.035) and a decline in levels of well-being (P = 0.031) were more likely to participate in institutional well-being support activities.

conclusionsOur preliminary data indicate that family medicine residents and teaching faculty were profoundly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies can be directed by current findings with focus on mitigation factors in addressing globally disruptive events such as COVID-19.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, GraduateFamily PracticeFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAcademic medicinegraduate medical educationmental healthprimary caretelemedicinework-related stress

Identifiers

PMID34448487
PMCPMC8414919
OpenAlexW3195003914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.