ReviewKorean journal of radiology2021
High-Resolution T2-Weighted MRI to Evaluate Rectal Cancer: Why Variations Matter.
Review in Korean journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic Phase-Sensitive Inversion Recovery and Extramural Vascular Invasion Scoring Systems for Vascular Invasion Detection and Metastasis Risk in Rectal Cancer.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Article
- Challenges in rectal cancer MRI: from image acquisition to interpretation.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Added value and clinical impact of second-opinion subspecialist radiologist interpretations of baseline rectal MRI in patients with rectal cancer.European radiology · 2026Article
- Performance of simulated abbreviated liver MRI combined with CT for liver metastasis screening in rectal cancer staging.European radiology · 2026Article
- Research progress in multimodal radiomics of rectal cancer tumors and peritumoral regions in MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Effects of clinical information on the treatment decisions for good responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy among rectal cancer patients.Annals of coloproctology · 2025Article
- Prospective and multi-reader evaluation of deep learning reconstruction-based accelerated rectal MRI: image quality, diagnostic performance, and reading time.European radiology · 2024Article
- Can Pretreatment MRI and Planning CT Radiomics Improve Prediction of Complete Pathological Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Treatment?Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Article
- Interpretation of Complete Tumor Response on MRI Following Chemoradiotherapy of Rectal Cancer: Inter-Reader Agreement and Associated Factors in Multi-Center Clinical Practice.Korean journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Looking Back at 2022 and ahead to 2023 for theKorean journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Looking Ahead to 2022 for theKorean journal of radiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.