Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34448276›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2021

Development of ex situ normothermic reperfusion as an innovative method to assess pancreases after preservation.

Ann Etohan Ogbemudia, Gabriella Hakim, Fungai Dengu, Faysal El-Gilani, Richard Dumbill, John Mulvey, Karen Sayal, Thomas Prudhomme, Benoit Mesnard, Kaithlyn Rozenberg and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sterile Pancreas Inflammation during Preservation and after Transplantation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Development ofTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Ann Etohan OgbemudiaNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6432-2856
Gabriella HakimNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Fungai DenguNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-9574
Faysal El-GilaniNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Richard DumbillNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1907-4758
John MulveyNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3843-2442
Karen SayalOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Thomas PrudhommeDepartment Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Toulouse Rangueil University, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3601-9339
Benoit MesnardInstitut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3314-1892
Kaithlyn RozenbergNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Letizia Lo FaroNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3846-0101
Timothy JamesOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Joshua OliverOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Edward SharplesNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3535-7379
Shruti MittalNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2390-5366
Paul JohnsonNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Peter J FriendNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0841-9685
Rutger PloegNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7801-665X
James HunterNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4972-6879
Julien BranchereauNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8460-9352

Funding

Institut Georges Lopez, France
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Static cold storage (SCS) is the standard method for pancreas preservation prior to transplantation; however, it does not permit organ assessment. Normothermic reperfusion (NR) is utilized clinically for other organs to assess viability. Our aim was to develop NR using normothermic machine perfusion technique to simulate reperfusion at the time of transplantation, enabling evaluation of oxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion (HMPO2) as a newer strategy to optimize pancreas preservation. 13 porcine pancreases procured after circulatory death were divided into 3 groups: 4 pancreases preserved using SCS, and 2 groups preserved by HMPO2 (n = 4 and n = 5, differing by type of preservation solution). Duration of perfusion or cold storage was 6 hours before the 1-hour assessment using NR. Outcome measures were perfusion characteristics, biochemistry and change in tissue water mass as oedema assessment. During NR, the HMPO2 groups demonstrated better perfusion characteristics, normal macroscopic appearances, decreased water mass and one HMPO2 group demonstrated a response to glucose stimulation. Conversely, the SCS group showed an increased water mass and developed early macroscopic appearances of oedema, interstitial haemorrhage and minimal portal outflow. This study suggests that ex situ assessment of pancreases by NR is promising, and that HMPO2 may be better than SCS.

Indexed as

Organ PreservationPancrelipaseAnimalsPancreasPerfusionReperfusionSwinePancrelipasenormothermic reperfusionorgan assessmentoxygenated hypothermic machine perfusionpancreas preservationpancreas transplantationporcine model

Identifiers

PMID34448276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.