Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34448028›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2022

Behavioral Interventions Targeting Insufficient Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening During Swallowing: A Scoping Review.

Sebastian H Doeltgen, Harsharan Kaur, Stephanie K Daniels, Leila Mohammadi, Joanne Murray

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Risk factors for dysphagia after stroke and efficacy evaluation of swallowing function training.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sebastian H DoeltgenSpeech Pathology, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, University Drive, Bedford Park, Adelaide, Australia. sebastian.doeltgen@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6722-2666
Harsharan KaurSpeech Pathology, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, University Drive, Bedford Park, Adelaide, Australia.
Stephanie K DanielsCommunication Sciences and Disorders, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Leila MohammadiThe Library, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1667-829X
Joanne MurraySpeech Pathology, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, University Drive, Bedford Park, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2994-4155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) plays a central role in safe swallowing. Impaired UES opening is commonly observed in individuals presenting with impaired swallowing and various interventions are available aiming to improve bolus passage across the UES during swallowing. This scoping review addressed the following question: Which behavioral interventions are available to improve UES opening for deglutition? We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Ovid Emcare, Web of Science, SCOPUS and ProQuest for studies that met the following criteria: i. behavioral interventions targeting UES opening ii. performed over a period of time, which iii. were assessed using UES specific outcome measures. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute and GRADE frameworks. Data were extracted and synthesized into dominant themes. Of the 357 studies originally identified, 15 met inclusion criteria and reported interventions that were grouped into four intervention types: (1) floor of mouth exercises that were sub-categorized into the Shaker exercise and other strengthening exercises, (2) Mendelsohn maneuver, (3) lingual exercises and (4) mixed exercise paradigms. Across the included studies, varying levels of success in improving various aspects of UES opening metrics were reported. Nine of 15 studies evaluated patients with demonstrated swallowing impairment, whereas six studies evaluated healthy adults. Quality assessment revealed significant variability in study quality, unclear reporting of participant training and treatment fidelity, as well as training dosage. The evidence base for the four behavioral intervention approaches targeting deglutitive UES opening is limited. The translation of existing evidence to clinical practice is hindered by small sample sizes and methodological limitations. Further research in this space is warranted.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersEsophageal Sphincter, UpperAdultDeglutitionExercise TherapyHumansManometryTongueDeglutitionDeglutition disordersDysphagiaExerciseRehabilitationSwallowingUpper esophageal sphincter

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.