Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34448011›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2021

Reverse chemical ecology in a moth: machine learning on odorant receptors identifies new behaviorally active agonists.

Gabriela Caballero-Vidal, Cédric Bouysset, Jérémy Gévar, Hayat Mbouzid, Céline Nara, Julie Delaroche, Jérôme Golebiowski, Nicolas Montagné, Sébastien Fiorucci, Emmanuelle Jacquin-Joly

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Molecular bases of insect odorant receptor function: specificity and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Accelerating Ligand Discovery for Insect Odorant Receptors.International journal of biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Gabriela Caballero-Vidal *INRAE, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université de Paris, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris, 78000, Versailles, France.
Cédric Bouysset *Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Institut de Chimie de Nice UMR7272, 28 avenue Valrose, 06108, Nice, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7814-8158
Jérémy GévarINRAE, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université de Paris, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris, 78000, Versailles, France.
Hayat MbouzidINRAE, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université de Paris, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris, 78000, Versailles, France.
Céline NaraINRAE, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université de Paris, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris, 78000, Versailles, France.
Julie DelarocheINRAE, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université de Paris, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris, 78000, Versailles, France.
Jérôme GolebiowskiUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Institut de Chimie de Nice UMR7272, 28 avenue Valrose, 06108, Nice, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3675-1952
Nicolas MontagnéINRAE, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université de Paris, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris, 78000, Versailles, France. nicolas.montagne@sorbonne-universite.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8810-3853
Sébastien FiorucciUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Institut de Chimie de Nice UMR7272, 28 avenue Valrose, 06108, Nice, France. sebastien.fiorucci@univ-cotedazur.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2245-0478
Emmanuelle Jacquin-JolyINRAE, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université de Paris, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris, 78000, Versailles, France. emmanuelle.joly@inrae.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6904-2036
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-15-IDEX-01Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-CE21-0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of reverse chemical ecology (exploitation of molecular knowledge for chemical ecology) has recently emerged in conservation biology and human health. Here, we extend this concept to crop protection. Targeting odorant receptors from a crop pest insect, the noctuid moth Spodoptera littoralis, we demonstrate that reverse chemical ecology has the potential to accelerate the discovery of novel crop pest insect attractants and repellents. Using machine learning, we first predicted novel natural ligands for two odorant receptors, SlitOR24 and 25. Then, electrophysiological validation proved in silico predictions to be highly sensitive, as 93% and 67% of predicted agonists triggered a response in Drosophila olfactory neurons expressing SlitOR24 and SlitOR25, respectively, despite a lack of specificity. Last, when tested in Y-maze behavioral assays, the most active novel ligands of the receptors were attractive to caterpillars. This work provides a template for rational design of new eco-friendly semiochemicals to manage crop pest populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophilaInsect ProteinsInsect RepellentsMachine LearningMothsOdorantsPheromonesReceptors, OdorantSmellSpodopterainsect attractantsInsect ProteinsInsect RepellentsPheromonesReceptors, OdorantBehaviorCrop protectionInsectsMachine learningSemiochemicalsSpodoptera littoralis

Identifiers

PMID34448011
PMCPMC8558168
OpenAlexW3194921174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.