ArticleMutagenesis2022
Towards an advanced testing strategy for genotoxicity using image-based 2D and 3D HepG2 DNA damage response fluorescent protein reporters.
Article in Mutagenesis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Effect of cell treatment procedures on in vitro genotoxicity assessment.Archives of toxicology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vitro assessment of mutagenicity is an essential component in the chemical risk assessment. Given the diverse modes of action by which chemicals can induce DNA damage, it is essential that these in vitro assays are carefully evaluated for their possibilities and limitations. In this study, we used a fluorescent protein HepG2 reporter test system in combination with high content imaging. To measure induction of the DNA damage response (DDR), we used three different green fluorescent protein reporters for p53 pathway activation. These allowed for accurate quantification of p53, p21 and BTG2 (BTG anti-proliferation factor 2) protein expression and cell viability parameters at a single cell or spheroid resolution. The reporter lines were cultured as 2D monolayers and as 3D spheroids. Furthermore, liver maturity and cytochrome P450 enzyme expression were increased by culturing in an amino acid-rich (AAGLY) medium. We found that culture conditions that support a sustained proliferative state (2D culturing with normal DMEM medium) give superior sensitivity when genotoxic compounds are tested that do not require metabolisation and of which the mutagenic mode of action is dependent on replication. For compounds, which are metabolically converted to mutagenic metabolites, more differentiated HepG2 DDR reporters (e.g. 3D cultures) showed a higher sensitivity. This study stratifies how different culture methods of HepG2 DDR reporter cells can influence the sensitivity towards diverse genotoxicants and how this provides opportunities for a tiered genotoxicity testing strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.