Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34447948›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science and technology2021

Technical requirements for cultured meat production: a review.

Sivasubramanian Ramani, Deunsol Ko, Bosung Kim, Changjun Cho, Woosang Kim, Cheorun Jo, Chang-Kyu Lee, Jungsun Kang, Sunjin Hur, Sungkwon Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Effect of Crude Polysaccharides fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Scaffolding Biomaterials for 3D Cultivated Meat: Prospects and Challenges.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sivasubramanian RamaniDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9370-6552
Deunsol KoDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7084-3551
Bosung KimDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5417-0238
Changjun ChoDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7964-3452
Woosang KimDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3742-5603
Cheorun JoDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2109-3798
Chang-Kyu LeeDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6341-0013
Jungsun KangGenebiotech, Seoul 06774, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9072-8211
Sunjin HurDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9386-5852
Sungkwon ParkDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7684-9719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environment, food, and disease have a selective force on the present and future as well as our genome. Adaptation of livestock and the environmental nexus, including forest encroachment for anthropological needs, has been proven to cause emerging infectious diseases. Further, these demand changes in meat production and market systems. Meat is a reliable source of protein, with a majority of the world population consumes meat. To meet the increasing demands of meat production as well as address issues, such as current environmental pollution, animal welfare, and outbreaks, cellular agriculture has emerged as one of the next industrial revolutions. Lab grown meat or cell cultured meat is a promising way to pursue this; however, it still needs to resemble traditional meat and be assured safety for human consumption. Further, to mimic the palatability of traditional meat, the process of cultured meat production starts from skeletal muscle progenitor cells isolated from animals that proliferate and differentiate into skeletal muscle using cell culture techniques. Due to several lacunae in the current approaches, production of muscle replicas is not possible yet. Our review shows that constant research in this field will resolve the existing constraints and enable successful cultured meat production in the near future. Therefore, production of cultured meat is a better solution that looks after environmental issues, spread of outbreaks, antibiotic resistance through the zoonotic spread, food and economic crises.

Indexed as

Cultured meatEmerging infectious diseaseHealth and wellnessLivestock and environment axisMeat alternativeNext industrial revolution

Identifiers

PMID34447948
PMCPMC8367405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.