Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34447940›Full record

ArticleImplementation research and practice2021

An implementation evaluation of "Zero Suicide" using normalization process theory to support high-quality care for patients at risk of suicide.

Julie E Richards, Gregory E Simon, Jennifer M Boggs, Rinad Beidas, Bobbi Jo H Yarborough, Karen J Coleman, Stacy A Sterling, Arne Beck, Jean P Flores, Cambria Bruschke and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05922670 (The BH-Works Suicide Prevention Program for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05922670 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The BH-Works Suicide Prevention Program for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth

TypeinterventionalSponsorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled18ConditionsSuicide, Engagement, PatientArmsThe Behavioral Health-Works Suicide Prevention Program for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Menopausal Suicidality and Fragmented Care: A Qualitative Study of Carer and Clinician Perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record Measures of Safety Planning Practices as Part of Zero Suicide Implementation.Archives of suicide research : official journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Julie E RichardsKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7037-4177
Gregory E SimonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jennifer M BoggsKaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Aurora, CO, USA.
Rinad BeidasPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bobbi Jo H YarboroughCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Karen J ColemanDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Stacy A SterlingDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Arne BeckKaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jean P FloresCare Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA.
Cambria BruschkeCare Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA.
Julie Goldstein GrumetEducation Development Center, Zero Suicide Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Christine C StewartKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Michael SchoenbaumDivision of Services and Intervention Research, National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Joslyn WestphalCenter for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Brian K AhmedaniCenter for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.

Funding

SSRI's and SuicidalityU19MH092201 · NIMH · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SIMON, GREGORY E. · 2010 to 2018
$19.5M
Patient perspectives on clinical approaches to prevent opioid related suicide attemptsU01MH114087 · NIMH · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI AHMEDANI, BRIAN KENNETH, SIMON, GREGORY E. · 2017 to 2021
$6.5M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH114087NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH092201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide rates continue to rise across the United States, galvanizing the need for increased suicide prevention and intervention efforts. The Zero Suicide (ZS) model was developed in response to this need and highlights four key clinical functions of high-quality health care for patients at risk of suicide. The goal of this quality improvement study was to understand how six large health care systems operationalized practices to support these functions-identification, engagement, treatment and care transitions.

methodsUsing a key informant interview guide and data collection template, researchers who were embedded in each health care system cataloged and summarized current and future practices supporting ZS, including, (1) the function addressed; (2) a description of practice intent and mechanism of intervention; (3) the target patient population and service setting; (4) when/how the practice was (or will be) implemented; and (5) whether/how the practice was documented and/or measured. Normalization process theory (NPT), an implementation evaluation framework, was applied to help understand how ZS had been operationalized in routine clinical practices and, specifically, what ZS practices were described by key informants (

resultsThe most well-defined and consistently measured ZS practices (current and future) focused on the identification of patients at high risk of suicide. Stakeholders also described numerous engagement and treatment practices, and some practices intended to support care transitions. However, few engagement and transition practices were systematically measured, and few treatment practices were designed specifically for patients at risk of suicide.

conclusionsThe findings from this study will support large-scale evaluation of the effectiveness of ZS implementation and inform recommendations for implementation of high-quality suicide-related care in health care systems nationwide.

Indexed as

health services researchimplementation sciencenormalization process theorySuicide preventionZero Suicide

Identifiers

PMID34447940
PMCPMC8384258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.