ArticleEndoscopy international open2021
Effectiveness of hemostatic powders in lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Coagulation with Clipping for Colonic Diverticular Bleeding: A Practical Hemostatic Strategy.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Efficacy of hemostatic powder for non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Therapy for Anastomotic Bleeding in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Review
- Post-polypectomy colorectal bleeding: current strategies and the way forward.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Systematic review of self-assembling peptides as topical agents for treatment and prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Use of TC-325 Hemostatic Powder as a Rescue Monotherapy for Management of Rectal Variceal Bleed.ACG case reports journal · 2024Article
- Hemostatic spray (TC-325) vs. standard endoscopic therapy for non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Endoscopy international open · 2023Review
- Hemostatic powders for gastrointestinal bleeding: a review of old, new, and emerging agents in a rapidly advancing field.Endoscopy international open · 2022Review
- Comparison of PuraStat self-assembling peptide hydrogel versus mineral-based Hemospray for endoscopic hemostasis of upper and lower gastrointestinal lesions in pigs.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.