ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2021
Fetal Brain Biometric Measurements on 3D Super-Resolution Reconstructed T2-Weighted MRI: An Intra- and Inter-observer Agreement Study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI-based assessment of fetal brain gyrification: Reliability across two methods.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Advances in automated fetal brain MRI segmentation and biometry: Insights from the FeTA 2024 challenge.Medical image analysis · 2026Article
- Towards automated fetal brain biometry reporting for 3-dimensional T2-weighted 0.55-3T magnetic resonance imaging at 20-40 weeks gestational age range.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- The early alteration of brainstem and cerebellum, and their relationship with cerebral cortex: anQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Lung volume segmentation in fetal MRI: super-resolution reconstructions improve inter-rater reliability.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Biometry and volumetry in multi-centric fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging: assessing the bias of super-resolution reconstruction.Pediatric radiology · 2025Article
- Automated craniofacial biometry with 3D T2w fetal MRI.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Automated Craniofacial Biometry with 3D T2w Fetal MRI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Assessment of fetal corpus callosum biometry by 3D super-resolution reconstructed T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Effect of magnet strength on fetal brain biometry - a single-center retrospective MRI-based cohort study.Neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Retrospective motion correction in foetal MRI for clinical applications: existing methods, applications and integration into clinical practice.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Geometric Reliability of Super-Resolution Reconstructed Images from Clinical Fetal MRI in the Second Trimester.Neuroinformatics · 2023Article
- ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023Article
- A Fetal Brain magnetic resonance Acquisition Numerical phantom (FaBiAN).Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the comparison of two-dimensional (2D) fetal brain biometry on magnetic resonance (MR) images using orthogonal 2D T2-weighted sequences (T2WSs) vs. one 3D super-resolution (SR) reconstructed volume and evaluation of the level of confidence and concordance between an experienced pediatric radiologist (obs1) and a junior radiologist (obs2). Twenty-five normal fetal brain MRI scans (18-34 weeks of gestation) including orthogonal 3-mm-thick T2WSs were analyzed retrospectively. One 3D SR volume was reconstructed per subject based on multiple series of T2WSs. The two observers performed 11 2D biometric measurements (specifying their level of confidence) on T2WS and SR volumes. Measurements were compared using the paired Wilcoxon rank sum test between observers for each dataset (T2WS and SR) and between T2WS and SR for each observer. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between each pair of measurements. Measurements were made with low confidence in three subjects by obs1 and in 11 subjects by obs2 (mostly concerning the length of the corpus callosum on T2WS). Inter-rater intra-dataset comparisons showed no significant difference (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.