ArticleInternational journal of preventive medicine2021
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the PARADISE-24 Questionnaire.
Article in International journal of preventive medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of robotic rehabilitation on fatigue experience, disability, and quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS): A systematic review and meta-analysis.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2024Review
- Male Factor Infertility and Risk of Multiple Sclerosis (MS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2023Review
- The Prevalence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of preventive medicine · 2023Review
- The Efficacy of Fingolimod and Interferons in Controlling Disability and Relapse Rate in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of preventive medicine · 2023Review
- Comparison of Psychological Difficulties in Patients with Migraine and Epilepsy Using PARADISE-24 Questionnaire.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with multiple sclerosis (MS) suffer from a wide range of psychological problems. Application of a valid and reliable tool for psychosocial assessment is required for Iranian patients. The aim of this study is to determine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the PARADISE-24 questionnaire in Iranian patients with multiple sclerosis.
methodsOne hundred and thirteen multiple sclerosis cases were enrolled in this study. Participants were asked to answer the valid and reliable Persian version of the fatigue severity scale, social support scale, Pittsburg sleep quality index, and hospital anxiety and depression scale and translated version of the PARADISE-24 questionnaire. Twenty cases filed the questionnaire 2 weeks later to assess reliability. The intraclass correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, correlation coefficients, and multiple regression analysis were used.
resultsMean age and mean duration of the disease were 35.8 ± 9.9 and 8.7 ± 5.6 years, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.8 to 0.94 and Cronbach's alpha values (Cronbach's alpha was calculated as 0.91 for the whole questionnaire) were also significant. There were significant correlations between PARADISE-24 score and expanded disability status scale (
conclusionsPersian version of PARADISE-24 questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating psychosocial aspects in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.