Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34447352›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2021

COVID-19 Pandemic and Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: No Significant Change in Glycemic Control During The Pandemic Lockdown of 2020.

Benjamin Udoka Nwosu, Layana Al-Halbouni, Sadichchha Parajuli, Gabrielle Jasmin, Emily Zitek-Morrison, Bruce A Barton

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical ArticleObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Endocrine manifestations of COVID-19 in children: A scoping review.Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Sustained Improvement in Glycemic Control in Emerging Adults with Type 1 Diabetes 2 Years After the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Worsening glycemic control in youth with type 2 diabetes during COVID-19.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin Udoka NwosuDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Layana Al-HalbouniDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Sadichchha ParajuliDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Gabrielle JasminDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Emily Zitek-MorrisonDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Bruce A BartonDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Vitamin D and Residual Beta-Cell Function in Type 1 DiabetesR21DK113353 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI NWOSU, BENJAMIN UDOKA · 2017 to 2019
$628k
NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK113353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There is no consensus on the impact of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the US. Aim: To determine the impact of the pandemic lockdown of March 15th through July 6 Subjects and Methods: An observational study of 110 subjects of mean age 14.8 ± 4.9 years(y), [male 15.4 ± 4.0y, (n=57); female 14.1 ± 3.8y, (n=53), p=0.07] with T1D of 6.31 ± 4.3y (95% CI 1.0-19.7y). Data were collected at 1-4 months before the lockdown and 1-4 months following the lifting of the lockdown at their first post-lockdown clinic visit. Results: There was no significant change in A1c between the pre- and post-pandemic lockdown periods, 0.18 ± 1.2%, (95% CI -0.05 to 0.41), p=0.13. There were equally no significant differences in A1c between the male and female subjects, -0.16 ± 1.2 Conclusions: There was no change in glycemic control during the pandemic lockdown of 2020 in US children.

Indexed as

Glycemic ControlQuarantineAdolescentAge FactorsBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringChildCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHistory, 21st CenturyHumansInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanInsulinadolescentschildrenCOVID-19 pandemichemoglobin A1ctype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID34447352
PMCPMC8383280
OpenAlexW3187844933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.